Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 433757100611731477
@Deleted User There you go, a 400 page book written by a jew that explains why the holocaust never happened.
This is so funny, Rex Collis being all nice and proletarian sympathizing Socialist on <#308950154222895104> yet being a hardcore Nazi in <#308995540782284817> this shit got me in tears
me?
@Deleted User You haven't been here for very long.....
@Deleted User I'm not sure if I've read any Stalin's policy that you'd like.
@Deleted User I haven’t lmao
Yes he does
@Deleted User Can you please be more specific about the policies you like?
and he comes to the very logical conclusion that to stop a supposed jewish oppression, he has to support and ideology (nazism/fascism) that is supported by the ruling classes and supportive of the ruling classes. Lmao natsocialism and fascism generally is so not woke
@Deleted User To an extent, clearly they have a major influence over the world, however, they use pawns to do most of the work for them, which relates in how most worldwide leaders have a great respect for israel and the jews as a whole.
Then why do Nazis support capitalism (which they did)?
@Deleted User They don't, none have.
lol
Strasser is offended
Strasser got shot in the back of the head during the night of the long knives.
Strasser was still a capitalist, but even his inclination to the left was too much for Fascist scum.
>shot
>night of long KNIVES
Yes and why? Because he was vaguely left leaning and somewhat anti capitalist
@Deleted User Nope, it's because he was marxist and was influencing the SA.
Strasser = Marxist
How wasen't he?
Not to mention increased capital returns, better performance of stock markets, increased privatization, selling of slave labor to private ownership like Ford.
*anti-capitalism intensifies*
he didn't follow any element of marxism
including the commodity form or the LTV
he was just vaguely anti-cap
@Deleted User And? How is privatization inherently capitalist?
Strasser wasn’t a Marxist, he was clearly a reformist if he was even remotely Socialist.
"privatization isn't capitalist"
wot
@Deleted User Because Capitalism, is private ownership over the means of production
like lmao
private ownership of industry is the definition of capitalism
I thought this guy knew what he was talking about at least a little bit
@Deleted User And? Because capitalism preferably uses privitization does not make privatization inherently capitalist.
@DA GOMMIE JOO Wrong.
it's not like privatization is socialist
@Deleted User It is the literal definition used in even liberal economics.
@Deleted User Show me the definition.
privatization is only found in capitalism
"trade and industry are controlled by private owners"
Wrong, it is used in democratic socialism, fedualism, tribalism, leninism, and chinese socialism.
>chinese socialism isn't capitalist
my sides