Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 433765880120475649
@Deleted User They can believe it, but in actuality, it dosen't, and I have already told you how national socialist economics aren't capitalistic in any sense.
i’ve explained to you why they are
And I explained to you why they still aren't.
through privatization, which is the end goal of Capitalism and especially laissez fair Capitalism, the bad, dysfunctional kind of Capitalism
Privatization isn't inherently capitalist, how many times do we have to go over this.
It is though
How is it?
Prove to me how it is without just saying "ET EZ THO!:
wow buddy I’m the one who argued for something, you’re the one going “privatization, the inherent function of Capitalism, is not Capitalist because I say so”
@Deleted User I showed you no longer than 10 minutes ago evidence from the merriam webster dictionary, that shows that because national socialist economics are not for profit only, they by definition are not capitalist.
Privatization carries with it the inherent need to make profit for yourself. If you privatize an industry, how do you expect that industry to perform production and sustain itself?
You can make the “it’s all for the state” argument in nationalized industries, but not in private ones. Because private ownership produces to sell, not to give away, like state owned production does
Oh what so now Capitalist nations that have a public sector are no longer Capitalist
Were you dropped?
@Deleted User Again, state comes first profit comes second, just because they have the state come first does not mean they cannot earn profit in the process.
Ahahahaha
Like I said before, we have no issue if people make profit off of privatization.
which is what we are talking about, Nazism is not anti capitalist
thanks for proving my point
Wrong, we hate capitalists.
What is a capitalist? Someone who owns privately. ahahaha how stupid are you
I have no problem with private ownership, but hate those who own the privately owned means
Really funny how dismissive you have become, and how much you repeat yourself over and over again, is it because you are losing and want to throw anything at me?
Because it’s a fundamental point
Very easy to get
@Deleted User For the fifth time now, I already told you how privatization isn't inherently capitalist.
It is though
How is it?
Just because extents change, doesn’t mean you’ve created a new system
@Deleted User Do not diverge.
Tell me how it is.
A country, which has all the functions of Capital in place, protects private property, takes profit FROM private property, and in which private property became progressively more prominent with the augmented returns in capital, is not anti capitalist. I’m fucking sorry. It’s simply a country in which markets are directed by a state who nationalizes some, and privatizes MOST industry to coordinate its economy for warfare. End of story
We are not talking about the history of nations which are not relevant right now, we are talking about national socialist economics.
As said, many countries have a commanding state and areas of the economy that are public and thus don’t work for profit, yet they are still capitalist
As well as that, just because profit has been made does not make it capitalist
And which countries are those?
Communist china? Vietnam?
China today is so, minus the intensity of running your whole economy for war
And China isn’t socilais
socialist
Even the leader of china admit's that china is no longer socialist.