Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 610103265765621760
Why am I checking for your claim?
it is gov census
Wikipedia is not the government census
that's a link
not the census
open the link, dumbass.
this is the revernce of the wiki entry
A reference to an inaccurate entry.
Secondhand information isn't likely to be good.
If you say that the data is not enetered correctly as argumet, go ahead and prove it, the burdon of proof is on you
Use the actual census.
it isnt second hand information
Give me the link.
Copy and paste it please.
i gave you the link what 6 times now
So I can open it and prove it to you.
No thats an image of the link
are you handicapped?
That's an image of the link
not the link
Considering you need me to do everything for you
I don't know which wikipedia entry this is.
idk type it out, you are the one trying to disprove my factual claims
go ahead do it
Then I may use a different link.
Then you would argue that its false because of that.
You made the cliam it was 11^, i looked it up myself and disproved you
Why won't you share your sources?
Is it because you edit them yourself?
now you may look up hings yourself to counter my argument that shows you are a lying piece of shit
What are you hiding by not sharing your sources?
You never showed your sources
You are awfully defensive, don't you think?
you claimed it was 11%
show us that it is 11%
I am trying to use your version of the government census.
Give me the link that you were proving.
the burdon of proof lies with you if you want to arguagainst my factaul data