until then you are a liar and a bad debater

Why am I checking for your claim?

it is gov census

Wikipedia is not the government census

that's a link

not the census

open the link, dumbass.

this is the revernce of the wiki entry

A reference to an inaccurate entry.

Secondhand information isn't likely to be good.

If you say that the data is not enetered correctly as argumet, go ahead and prove it, the burdon of proof is on you

Use the actual census.

it isnt second hand information

Give me the link.

its directly from

Copy and paste it please.

i gave you the link what 6 times now

So I can open it and prove it to you.

No thats an image of the link

are you handicapped?

Are you ?

That's an image of the link

not the link

Considering you need me to do everything for you

I don't know which wikipedia entry this is.

idk type it out, you are the one trying to disprove my factual claims

go ahead do it

Then I may use a different link.

Then you would argue that its false because of that.

You made the cliam it was 11^, i looked it up myself and disproved you

Why won't you share your sources?

Is it because you edit them yourself?

now you may look up hings yourself to counter my argument that shows you are a lying piece of shit

What are you hiding by not sharing your sources?

You never showed your sources

You are awfully defensive, don't you think?

you claimed it was 11%

show us that it is 11%

I am trying to use your version of the government census.

Give me the link that you were proving.