Images don't mean shit.

You are derailing and dodging

You are dodging showing your supposedly true citations.

Your words dont mean shit , you said it was 11% i showed it wasnt.

You only post facebook posts and extremely cropped screenshots.

rebut

It isnt a face book post it is a screen shot swhoing black white population numbers in 1930

which is based of

Give the link

not an image

just copy right?

then paste.

Which you could have typed out 4 times if you werent busy derailing so much

Im not going to help you form your strawmen argument

i proved that you were wrong on the 11%

did it again

Okay I will use a different government link, how's that?

Don't whine if it doesn't match your petty definitions.

Im waiting

you claimed it was 11%

i see facts that say otherwise

so as you did not support your argument at all for the past pages of bullshit you spouted it would be time you come up with some evidence

Turns out I was factoring in mixed race and hispanics when I said 11%

I'll give you that.

But that means whites were 89%.

https://census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2002/demo/POP-twps0056.pdf

Which was what, my whole point.

(1861400+11891143)/122775046*100

But how are mixed races white?

No-one defines them as white.

Besides you being a lying pos you are still arguing over numbers that have simply been lost in the rounding off

They are mixed race.

Rounding off is not good on a serious academic post.

Numbers should be as accurate as possible.

"they are not listed as white " Again with the lies

You are listed what ever you fill ini on the sheet

Where is this citation?

idk where your citation is, you are still not providing any sources to aything you are saying

Your facebook posts mean nothing.

Your words mean nothing