Guys, look, I posted an image.
Give me the link you said was the reference.
Why can't you give your proof?
Images don't mean shit.
You are derailing and dodging
You are dodging showing your supposedly true citations.
Your words dont mean shit , you said it was 11% i showed it wasnt.
You only post facebook posts and extremely cropped screenshots.
rebut
It isnt a face book post it is a screen shot swhoing black white population numbers in 1930
which is based of
Give the link
not an image
just copy right?
then paste.
Which you could have typed out 4 times if you werent busy derailing so much
Im not going to help you form your strawmen argument
i proved that you were wrong on the 11%
did it again
Okay I will use a different government link, how's that?
Don't whine if it doesn't match your petty definitions.
Im waiting
you claimed it was 11%
i see facts that say otherwise
so as you did not support your argument at all for the past pages of bullshit you spouted it would be time you come up with some evidence
Turns out I was factoring in mixed race and hispanics when I said 11%
I'll give you that.
But that means whites were 89%.
https://census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2002/demo/POP-twps0056.pdf
Which was what, my whole point.
(1861400+11891143)/122775046*100
But how are mixed races white?
No-one defines them as white.
Besides you being a lying pos you are still arguing over numbers that have simply been lost in the rounding off
They are mixed race.
Rounding off is not good on a serious academic post.
Numbers should be as accurate as possible.
"they are not listed as white " Again with the lies
You are listed what ever you fill ini on the sheet
Where is this citation?
