LOL

the source you gave begs to differ

can you point out where the article is wrong?

https://skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=77

describe how this article is wrong in stating that CO2 and climate are closely linked in detail

climate is one thing, but it isnt the driving factor of global warming

the sun is

so the sun was less active then

exactly

and CO2 was at about the same levels

but sea levels were above where they are now by 25 meters

thats one point they point out

the arctic was roughly 13 degrees celsius warmer

you know the sun doesn't change over just 100 years

so co2 doesnt corralates as a constant with temprature

global temperatures were 3-4 degrees warmer

it changes over millions of years

climate gas consistancy doesnt dictates teh temprature

the sun does

both contribute

the passage itself says that the sun was less active but temperatures were higher

hey hey hey

listing in detail that sea levels, ice cap temperatures, and global average temperatures were higher

by several degrees celsius

despite the fact that CO2 was at the same levels it is now

and the sun was less active

So less activity less co2 higher temp

same level of co2 😄

so with the sun being active and with as much CO2 we should get something even worse

like the arctic seeing wildfires

bruh

or hurricanes so powerful they're dubbed "super storms"

But we are at those levels of co2

or major polar vortices

with a active sun

so

whats your point exatly ?

I've been listing shit that's actively happening