You always avoid talking about *this* for some reason, and it's the crucial part of the leap from biological truisms to political action that I've spent the most time focussing on.

@Garbage lol wikipedia, the media that any one can edit

Your definition is wrong

This would be racial supremacy 😄

Did you know that racial supremacy is a conjoined term?, it means something else then racism

First thing i read, and easyly refuted, your arguments are so weak

>your definition is wrong

>anyone can edit wikipedia

>but when I use it, it's fine

Besides that, you're now just bolting on your own definition. And it dodges the fact that you support racial segregation at a highly organised and city-state level.

You only ping me when you think you've cornered me. In reality, you're at your weakest when you ping me for some reason!

You are not refutting your wrongness, you are dodging , and you start to slander the person. You are doing this because you have been corerd. When you are cornered you start to project. @Garbage

@Deleted User if your Ego got any bigger Neil Degrasse Tyson would make a documentary about it

i'm aussie

👏

Well done, you are part of a country.

I was worried you were going to be from Mars.

So you ran out of arguments.

No counters. Nothing.

***I see everything!***

**I know everything!**

***__Welcome to the Dominatening!__***

@Garbage you are projecting again, its a constant with you. you ran out of arguments, lmfoa you dont even know what racism means, ou think it means racial supremacy 😄

all you do is disagree on the definition of a word

you literally retreat to semantics when you cant win an argument

And then he pulls the 'semantics' card when I put my own definitions on the table.

```you are projecting again, its a constant with you. you ran out of arguments, lmfoa you dont even know what racism means, ou think it means racial supremacy :smile:
```

Restating what you said when I've already showed that reactionaries are rebranding what you call 'racism' as 'race realism' is merely serving up something irrelevant.

**Notice how you still won't talk about your own politics and how you try to justify a non-trivial politics based on things which are ultimately true in a trivial fashion.**

I even made it easy for you to use the article I brought up because I posted a screenshot of where it talks about old definitions which are consistent with yours, but then you still have to explain the rebranding which reactionary 'scientists' are practising.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=my6yGp-oGf8

Consider that a buttsecks.

cringe

Also, given that one of the mods (Firefly) is acting like a shill and the spam indicates that there's a zerg rush of reactionaries coming, I'm outta here. You were a fun punching bag, but now you're boring.

But reactonaries make great punching bags.

*British Grenadiers steadily gets louder* Did Somebody Say Reactionaries?