Message from @Cúchulainn
Discord ID: 608088254943854612
some kind of religious significance
These stats are quite accurate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwKPFT-RioU
ye rip the 50 million orthodox russians
@Deleted User i think that one avoids china
They werent all Orthodox lol
Stalin legalized the church after the war
Some of them might have been
" The Orthodox Christian Czar penned the following in 1905, "I do not believe that everything that is now going on in Russia is due to the Russian people. The labor strikes are organized by the Polish and Jewish engineers. The world accuses us of making pogroms, but I believe that the pogroms are a natural appearance. The Jews wish to dominate over Russia and over the Russian Czars. We defend ourselves...."
Soviets were aggressors
@Prometheus lol
@Cúchulainn gaze upon this
I am.
On what. @Ned Kelly
Cursed.
Hideously cursed.
You are retarded, hopelessly so.
Read Siege by James Mason and get the fuck off the internet.
'which holocaust'
Why not both?
Perhaps because both are backed by endless amounts of historical evidence?
The bombings in Japan.
The Burning of Belarus.
The firebombings in Munich.
Not one voice among you rises to protest these atrocities.
Driving
Yet wherein 12 (and yes, it is consistently twelve since approximately a decade after it took place), millions died, and there is many times as much of witness testimonies, chemical evidences, remaining architecture, and so on to demonstrate that fact, it is hard to think with the sheer number of people screeching about 'muh shoah'
There is at least as much evidence for that Jewish Holocaust of 1933 to 1945 as there is for Dresden, Munich, Berlin, and countless others combined.
So please, commit toaster bath.
And by no means does demonstration and preserving of the memory surrounding HaShoah deny or obscure other genocides, except for those few times it is used with malicious intent.
Ha, yes.
he was really the creator of holocaust revisionism i believe
This is why memes are used by you lot.
Because they're impossible to argue with.
The book that is cited is very obviously not unbiased by its title alone, and the image expects you to pull up an obscure book that you do not already have unless you agree with this obnoxious drivel to begin with, and dig through to page 382 in order to cite a quote that may or may not be there, from a man that may or may not have ever even said it.
The meme has but one purpose. Propaganda.
And it is nearly unmatched in effectiveness when used in that role.
you can say the same for holocaust memoirs
Except, one cannot.
Between fascistic memes and holocaust memoirs, there is mountains of evidence, testimony, and near-universal historical and academic consensus for one side, the memoirs. On the other side, there is shitty pseudo-intellectual propaganda delivered in a concise, simplistic, and entertaining format.
So no, one cannot say the same for Holocaust memoirs.