and Europe is a pretty homogenous continent when it's comes to races and ethnicities

Literally anywhere in the Balkans has a roach problem

not really

if you mean the Albanians yes

and the Bosnians

but not the entire Balkan Subregion

Romanian has a few roachs i can't deny the fact

but the majority are white

Heil King Zog

Yes but a roach is still a roach

It's a literal anecdote from me @Maca Nebunică don't take it as an empirical fact.
It just so happened the only two families I know from Romania are recent Turkish immigrants

If it's a roach majority it's game over

And Europe is not homogenous

when?

Being white doesn't make you equal to mediterraneans or nords

It's a silly blanket term

being white means you're descent from European nations which majority of the population is white

Yes that is objectively accurate

you can be Hungarian, even if you're finno-ugric your traits look european

and same with Finnish

due the homogenous progress

But for the sake of specification, "white" is not a good term to define European ethnicities

Race is not skin-deep, after all

What do you think of these turk immigrants?

Even as a minority

They move in as families and are good workers

they should go back where they come from

no matter what

even if they have good intentions

that's what parasites do, they move to other nations

because they are not capable to fix their nation's economy

that's what exactly describes the jews

and turks aswell

How about saying imperialism drove them to different countries. How about if you left them alone and it never would have never happened.

Wait I remembered someone was afraid of overpopulation and wanted some extra resources to run their countries.

Not to mention cheap labor.

@Prometheus im surprised you are still a capitalist after all this time. Whats keeping you to the economic system?

Well it's more of an ideal of Capitalism, than an existing form of Capitalism. I am thinking of leaving that mindset, but Ayn Rand went quite deep.
I mean I can't completely side with collectivism as it roots out the individual and I want to have control of myself rather than drowning myself to a cause.
If I am not for Capitalism I am still for Individualism as I find it allows more diversity of character and capacity to be the master of your own fate in your own rite.

It's more like if I live, I live alone and if I die, I die alone.
To let live and not get in other people's way until they get into mine.
Adopting personal responsibity seems more satisfying than wanting.
I want to succeed with my own ability somehow

I wasn't finished yet

I'll continue further

I don't think I'll ever be fully a Capitalist because I remain skeptical and don't trust the establishment one bit.
But I don't know any other way than free exchange.
I guess Anarchism does seem pretty appealing to me but I can't imagine a society without a state.
Especially when it comes to crimes and evil that people do on their own. I still feel there should be courts. Even if they are imperfect as they are, I mean it's better than nothing.