?

As in praxis or dealing with the state?

Im trying not to be some pseudo lmfao

your logic

doesn't make any sense at all

I mean in the case of perpetual war

you just represent weakness, and that's why you're a "Anarcho-Communist" cuck

I actually find it pretty hot to fuck someones wife or gf in from of them

And internal corruption.

haha

Burning the head of the hydra

All heads must be destroyed

But then it is replaced with another hydra. The cycle seems never ending.

So you kill it again and again

Well you need power for that

We live in a generation that was proven that police stating and advanced military is nothing against Guerrilla war

Have you heard of the song “out in the fields”

No I haven't

“No banner or religion can ever stop the bullet from a gun”

But it feels an like enforced order, but I agree, no order is without a bullet of a gun.

Its only a matter of time

But you fear that someday, that gun isn't pointed at you. Something like karma
I mean the proletariats of today become the bourgeoisie of tomorrow.
Similar the overthrow of them leads to replacement of power again.
The cycle just repeats itself, quite nicely proven by Marx.

The bourgeoise live in a state of “the great game”

If we could get a nice way, to exchange wealth in such a way in which we could avoid conflict and have maximum peace.

There are indication we could get there. Idk to tbh
Anyway what do you think of this UBI(Universal Basic Income) idea.

I think it's enslavement

At least that's what I think.

The Elite furthering their grip.

Though if you look at it from another angle as a layman it looks nice.

But I don't even understand how they will manage. After all the US is in dept, etc

Unsure

It can help people

It can decimate their lives

Yeah could go either ways, we just have see if it is ever implemented.

GB does a bad job at it, while Canada does it really well

So it might depend, how well it is handled. Interesting

GB tries to push it with their “pro elite” ideas

Also known as Anglo Liberalism

Anglo Liberalism might want to check it out in more detail. I am aware to an extent, but not that much.
Also I feel I do have the need to learn, more older forms capitalism in more detail.

Older forms of Capitalism are why this late stage capitalism is so “controlling”

I even heard something interesting from Chomsky that Adam Smith had different stuff in mind for Capitalism that many of the modern economists never acknowledge.
It was more inclined to an welfare state, rather than a full free market system that most propose.
I'll try to find the source. I don't know if Chomsky is right, but I found it interesting.

The late Capitalism is so controlling because of many reasons.
I think the ruling elite of America never died, they changed shaped, but controlled massively Business and the State.