@Squid Pro Quo it’s not the power aspect that’s bad it’s the fact that its hereditary, all of Rome’s best leaders except for one where chosen albeit not through democratic vote

Having absolute power is usually bad yes

My general idea of a good Autocracy would be

A central leader who would server until their resignation or death, but with a senate or something to ensure Constitutional rights are protected

That sounds good functionally speaking

But again,ethically I don’t think it would stand

Not arguing from effectiveness exclusively here

I mean,eugenics is technically effective but it’s unethical as fuck

Yeah obviously

Lol

I’m perplexed by that and your profile roles

But you do you I guess

Why?

Eugenics was mostly a National Socialist thing

Ah

Well,fascism and nazism sorta blend together in my experience

Not always

But a good portion

There's like

At least a dozen ideologies that could be considered fascist

Fascism is more of an umbrella term like Communism

Fair point

Never good to get ideologies confused I suppose

Tired of being associated with those bloody Stalinists

Lol

*young Stalin was sexy though...*

A lot of national socialists I can't take seriously

Because National Socialism is meant for German/Nordic people

It’s always the bloody Jews with them

Gets old quick

In my opinion anyway

<:PepeChill:552613722502332416>

DA JOOS

Eh

I'm against Zionism and Judaism myself

But genocide is wrong no matter the circumstance

I’m against religion and nationalism and stuff

But like

Jews themselves are groovy

They’re doing their thing and I’m doing mine

I don’t campaign against Judaism or whatever