More like nazis don’t know the origins of socialism so they go with the definitions of small brained economists and low quality dictators

thats not how philosophy works lol

there are definitions that are proprietary to particular disciplines @☭ Anon ☭

no specific type of socialists have hegemony over the word

That doesn’t mean conflicting definitions can be correct. Socialism has its origins in the writings of utopian socialists, not whatever bullshit nazis are putting forth. They are socialist only to themselves

I’ll get back to this later nig

point is there is no "correct" definition if the standard its being evaluated in light of isnt determined already

marxists and spenglarians obviously use socialism differently. im interested to hear what considerations there are that would oblige me to think one is more legitimate than the other in and of themselves

@Łukasz lol no

@Blueroad dm me if you’d like to continue later

im trying not to procrastinate rn rip

ill have to add you if thats ok i have dms for non friends disabled

That’s fine

I made it a goal of mine to learn calculus this summer because I have an interest in physics

@Łukasz do you think any of that is a useful contribution lol

any prospect of a meaningful conversation

what are you doing for national socialism?

when are you going to start killing the movementarians, siegelets, pedophiles, etc that plague the movement?

yeah you dont have any plans

if anybody in ns had plans there wouldnt need to be any discussion about how pedophiles and other scum run the movement

keep spinning your wheels in the mud

only two "successful" european ns are nrm and gd and neither of them are successful on the political level

only as community support

i dont see how thats relevant

is what i said not true?

whos above nrm and gd or up with them

whos above nrm and gd or up with them

how are they successful? lol

they have literally no political power?? lol

being a boon to a community doesnt cut it

im assuming im gonna get the political power doesnt matter currently shpeel

there it is

yeah this is typical iron march rhetoric "heh were gonna convert a hundred strong men and start a revolution", or the typical alternative "grass roots populism, bro!" . ironic how ns movements have been in the same if not getting into a worse condition in certain places since the 50s

good luck with that.

you live in a post ww2 liberal paradigm and you think your gonna make national socialism popular. its absurd

yeah your just saying more stuff. national socialism is in a tragic situation globally. even its largest contingents are struggling to stay afloat, cant even remain consistent to the core presupposition of ns, dealing with internal struggle as a consequence of minor disagreements, and opportunism. what did Mason, Dr. Pierce, and Hitler all say? "We care about results".

wheres the results? lol

dont get me wrong, the whole going down with the ship thing is romantic, but i just dont give a shit really

ns people will trash evola for ducking fascism to escape the charges but he was smart to do so considering what it was going to turn into

dude, are you telling me that euro ns movements are actually getting shit done? and i mean other than the kind of stuff that your typical community center does

because i was involved for a long time, and guess what, they werent shit then and they still arent