Why would we is not relevant

depends on the whole context

Why would we is not relevant

it would be ethically acceptable to go do it for no reason

if humanity is the trait

without context you can't make out the whole point

ur looking at these things in a vacuum

killing them would be totally justifiable on the context

"so if you can kill this for food then you can genocide this"

but humans are so much more complicated

^^

and its not like humans would have a uniform opinion

if you kill an animal to eat, then you're doing it for your survival

you eat because you need it

if say we DID start slaughtering aliens

when you don't, why would you do it?

there would be people for it, and then there would be people against it

just like how you and me and tyrone are having this discussion rn

cause we disagree on things

we dont just hivemind on it

@Deleted User Dude noooo

im getting off topic though sorry

U didnt get it hold on

there's nothing to get

its literal survival

you eat because if you don't, you die

@Pookins Thats irrelevant

we arent talking about pragmatics

We are talking about YOU

yes, me, my personal feelings

So you have your own moral framework yes?

and my personal feelings is i like dogs

and i like cats

Yes

i like eating pork, beef

chicken

Yes

the mass farms can be upsetting, but i turn a blind eye because i enjoy eating those things

So if you cannot name the trait , then by your own moral framework you are commiting an immoral act

i dont like eating human

Phuck mass farming, even if a cow lived happily till slaughter on green pastur

its still immoral