you were using your lungs wrong last night

by fucking breathing

do the world a favour and stop doing that

I looked up the definition and it is defined as pre-pubescent

damn

not the argument I was making

so it's fine as soon as they become pubescent

Fertility does not justify grooming children for sexual purposes.

breh

why are you making me side with the fascists and whatever the hell eigentumlichkeit is

his name describes his ideology p well tbh

lang lebe

Thanks.

aye

it's unique

still haven't wrapped my head around it

but first, let us burn the paedophile

"Fertility does not justify grooming children for sexual purposes."

Except it does though

For me he's either a troll or someone with serious mental issues, either way giving him attention can only be prejudicial form him and others, he should seek help from people capable to help him.

I don't have to follow your liberal conventions

I would rather look at biology and make my own inferences

looking at biology, murdering you right now is perfectly justifiable

and fortunately, i'm not a liberal

Yes you are

stop lying

just because it was done historically doesn't make it beneficial

i'm mostly pre-modernist you stupid wanker

It is beneficial if you want the best for eugenics

eugenics has been debunked by biology

HAHA

ohboy

and no, the survivability rates are far lower

eugenics is bullshit

as is most forms of ""biology"" toted by edgy paedos on the internet

Yea, 16 is probably prime age tbqh

bred at 15

no

birth at 16

and why do you say bred

that's regarded as creepy even by premodernist standards

stats show that 16 year olds make healthy babies