Message from @Shane
Discord ID: 644788964150083586
A high heritability of a trait does not mean that environmental effects such as learning are not involved. Vocabulary size, for example, is very substantially heritable (and highly correlated with general intelligence) although every word in an individual's vocabulary is learned. In a society in which plenty of words are available in everyone's environment, especially for individuals who are motivated to seek them out, the number of words that individuals actually learn depends to a considerable extent on their genetic predispositions and thus heritability is high.[15]
Since heritability increases during childhood and adolescence, and even increases greatly between 16–20 years of age and adulthood, one should be cautious drawing conclusions regarding the role of genetics and environment from studies where the participants are not followed until they are adults. Furthermore, there may be differences regarding the effects on the g-factor and on non-g factors, with g possibly being harder to affect and environmental interventions disproportionately affecting non-g factors.[18]
Polygenic traits often appear less heritable at the extremes. A heritable trait is definitionally more likely to appear in the offspring of two parents high in that trait than in the offspring of two randomly selected parents. However, the more extreme the expression of the trait in the parents, the less likely the child is to display the same extreme as the parents. At the same time, the more extreme the expression of the trait in the parents, the more likely the child is to express the trait at all. For example, the child of two extremely tall parents is likely to be taller than the average person (displaying the trait), but unlikely to be taller than the two parents (displaying the trait at the same extreme).
Reread that slowly. I did read thism
It doesn't say what you think it does.
Okay, now onto racial differences in IQ related genes Lynnnsnd Vanhanen (2012)
Lynn*
But you understand, what I was pointing out was it isn't just a given just on the basses of certain inate qualities based on race I'll explain you piece by piece
It makes a strong case of social conditions which I was pointing out to
Such effects of IQ was generally even based on the characteristics of a person, on his ability to learn
Many more factors on heritably
My pointing out this to you is that, I wasn't guaranteeing everything based on race but many more characteristics in general. Than a supposition on the heredity element
All of this was taken from here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ#Caveats
Nope, you don't even know what it is about.
Neither do you
friend
It said it found genes that are associated with intelligence.
But I know what I am talking about
What the Author says is utterly trivial.
Only the data matters.
Read the Lynn study.
Howdy
No you don't.
My server just got partnered here
<:shane:624037230100348948>
I'll be taking those
You haven't made a single argument against race and IQ.
Well then if you understand, give me a conclusion
I have made my case
you simply refuse to look
`RACE AND IQ`
hell of a thing to walk in on innit
I am asking you to prove it, because it is more entertaining that way.
First time dealing with someone like you
I can tell.
who just shut his eyes
What a disingenuous person you are sir
Okay nigger.
yeah call me that
he said it boys he said the nigger word
like it matters
@Shane thank you.
Good job mongoloid
Shitdick nigger faggot fried chicken nigger.
`First person to say nigger in an argument loses`
nigger