Brb

Well you might say that but why would the Nazi's put the emphasis of being a unique Aryan Race. At least that's what I know
The Indian were Aryans, but not the way Nazi's considered themselves.
Also this is a complicated subject, I don't know how much should I agree with you.
After all the conception was strong in the Nazi's I mean the Jews were considered as race weren't they?
The Volk under German Nationalism which was focus lot on pagan ideas and the idea of perfection of the Aryan Race and putting the German Nation above the status it had before WW1
From it's previous failures and humiliation.

wtf

is that your mom jizz on my dick?

ok

Rudolf Steiner

was greatly influenced by the occult and the ideas of root races and there evolution pretty much came from the Theosophical Society.

Even the Nationalist Socialist Worker Party was formed initially through a secret society called The Thule Society. Which we have credible evidence for.

The root race idea is clearly from Blavatsky

I'll even source them here so you can see

The Aryan Race was the Fifth Root race to emerged though humanity's evolution.

Nah that Aryan Race is Gibberish

I just mean to say, what I believe that's where the Nazi's got the idea of Aryan Race

Blah blah blah blah. You realize I never was trying to say the Aryan race is superior. I wasn't using Nazi race theory. stop using this to dodge the discussion.

Yeah I saw that

I believe that niggers are inferior to whites. Disprove this claim.

I fucking dare you.

Fucking fried chicken eating watermelon eating coons.

woah

well the Bertrand Russell stuff was to disprove that I'll quote a more specific part.

The fallacies about "race" and "blood," which have always been popular, and which the Nazis have embodied in their official creed, have no objective Justification; they are believed solely because they minister to self-esteem and to the impulse toward cruelty. In one form or another, these beliefs are as old as civilization; their forms change, but their essence remains. Herodotus tells how Cyrus was brought up by peasants, in complete ignorance of his royal blood; at the age of twelve his kingly bearing toward other peasant boys revealed the truth. This is a variant of an old story which is found in all Indo-European countries. Even quite modem people say that "blood will tell." It is no use for scientific physiologists to assure the world that there is no difference between the blood of a Negro and the blood of a white man. The American Red Cross, in obedience to popular prejudice, at first, when America became involved in the present war, decreed that no Negro blood should be used for blood transfusion. As a result of an agitation, it was conceded that Negro blood might be used, but only for Negro patients. Similarly, in Germany, the Aryan soldier who needs blood transfusion is carefully protected from the contamination of Jewish blood.

@Korewa Krusader ur claim is untrue

There was no qualitative evidence.

Niggers perform shot in nearly every way.

@BigShawn424 How so?

Perform worse*

In the matter of race, there are different beliefs in different societies. Where monarchy is firmly established, kings are of a higher race than their subjects. Until very recently, it was universally believed that men are congenitally more intelligent than women; even so enlightened a man as Spinoza decides against votes for women on this ground. Among white men, it is held that white men are by nature superior to men of other colors, and especially to black men; in Japan, on the contrary, it is thought that yellow is the best color. In Haiti, when they make statues of Christ and Satan, they make Christ black and Satan white. Aristotle and Plato considered Greeks so innately superior to barbarians that slavery is justified so long as the master is Greek and the slave barbarian. The Nazis and the American legislators who made the immigration laws consider the Nordics superior to Slavs or Latins or any other white men. But the Nazis, under the stress of war, have been led to the conclusion that there are hardly any true Nordics outside Germany; the Norwegians, except Quisling and his few followers, have been corrupted by intermixture with Finns and Laps and such. Thus politics are a clue to descent. The biologically pure Nordic loves Hitler, and if you do not love Hitler, that is proof of tainted blood.

Thank you autocorrect.

ur claim is that blacks are inferior to whites?

Yes, that was a response to a different race theory.

All this is, of course, pure nonsense, known to be such by every-one who has studied the subject. In schools in America, children of the most diverse origins are subjected to the same educational system, and those whose business it is to measure intelligence quotients and otherwise estimate the native ability of students are unable to make any such racial distinctions as are postulated by the theorists of race. In every national or racial group there are clever children and stupid children. It is not likely that, in the United States, colored children will develop as successfully as white children, because of the stigma of social inferiority; but in so far as congenital ability can be detached from environmental influence, there is no clear distinction among different groups. The whole conception of superior races is merely a myth generated by the overweening self-esteem of the holders of power. It may be that, some day, better evidence will be forthcoming; perhaps, in time, educators will be able to prove (say) that Jews are on the average more intelligent than gentiles. But as yet no such evidence exists, and all talk of superior races must be dismissed as nonsense.

well some blacks are

but a good amount of them arent

like me

That isn't an argument. Taking outliers to make a point on average is fallicious.

so where do u stand

The idea of race creation myth is to hold power the emphasis Bertrand Russell is trying to put here

do u think blacks are inferior or not

I'll have to bring Chomsky again