Paved With Good Intentions by Jared Taylor

"Nine Years Among the Indians, 1870-1879: The Story of the Captivity and Life of a Texan Among the Indians" (https://www.amazon.com/Nine-Years-Among-Indians-1870-1879-ebook/dp/B075X26BT7/ref=pd_sim_351_23?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=0ZCA3AYME89KM0JPAJSM

@SamanthaM is this story about the Parker family?

No idea. Haven't read this one. Posted it because it looked interesting. Maybe someone could check it out :)

Broke "Paved with Good Intentions" Woke "Paved with (((Bad Intentions))).

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691616659391

Microaggressions have no serious literature support and lacks attachment to many essential fields of social science.

Source: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbepop/v29n2/a07v29n2.pdf

Brazil's dysgenics are horrific

http://paa2012.princeton.edu/papers/122630

Correlation doesn't equal causation, but interracial marriages are not good

https://people.stanford.edu/vfouka/sites/default/files/foukamazumdertabellinimay2018.pdf

tldr version: more blacks in an area during the great migration meant that white immigrants became Americans faster

@Nemets this is really good stuff. I've saved a ton of what you've posted. Please continue!

@CarletonJ There was a twitter account back in 2015/6 that was way more diligent

Librarian of Hate

https://archive.is/LRe05

@Nemets Great link! I've had it saved for sometime. It is extremely useful for debates.

Unfortunately, I never got to see the Twitter in action.. I'm sure it caused quite an uproar as facts tend to

there's an updated version of that here: https://libraryofhate.com/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886918302903

Does anyone have access?

tldr version: metastudy that shows that: women's fertility more dysgenic than men, American fertility has gotten more dysgenic since Roe vs Wade, nonwhite women are breeding particularly dysgenically, and black males' fertility is barely dysgenic at all

I don't know how high quality the study is - a lot more variance in nonwhites' results than whites results.

That's concerning. I'm reading the study right now

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/ethnoracial-homogeneity-and-public-outcomes-the-noneffects-of-diversity/EB414203FD75A1601575110C9FFE7A36

Diversity is good - mostly black areas in Brazil do better than all black areas