He is one of the fathers of Fascism.

Mussolini didn't achieve shit

@Deleted User He did.

He pulled his nation from the big pile of shit it was in and made his nation the strongest in Mediterranian, and he strongly inspired Adolf Hitler.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-qRw64eIRs

Mussolini was a great man

But Hitler is a God

<:heil:449290177316388874> <:heil:449290177316388874> <:heil:449290177316388874>

I agree.

<:thistbh:449290177752334356>

Italy was still a pile of shit after the war too, it was agrarian until the late 50s. Mussolini didn't have the capacity to declare a new Roman Empire at all, the manufacturing base just wasn't there, and Mussos appointment of "we must refight the last war" syndrome generals blew up in his face. Hitler took Poland in a matter of a month, France, another great power alongside it. Musso couldn't take Greece by himself at all

He is a fascist, yes, but his mistakes overshadow his contributions

Smh

Read the DVX article from ropeculture

Someone has the archived link

People like you @Deleted User who only read from popular cultural sources shouldn't form any opinions on real men.

https://archive.is/5XiYS

Mussolini was one of the greatest men of all time

He was an inspiration to all the other great men of the 20th century. Hitler, Codreanu, Degrelle etc

Dante never dissappoints (except on the Russians, there is wrong).

🙏 Meds 4 Meds 🍝

@Deleted User Wait, you called me Mediterranian?

I called myself and DVX meds

Oh, good then.

If Mussolini wasn't around, Europe would've been in full destruction by now and the (((Kalergi))) was going to be successful earlier. Plus without him, Hitler, Codreanu, Franco, etc. these men would have not risen up. If Europe was destructed, then perhaps we wouldn't be here.

I thank Mussolini for giving such great inspiration to wonderful men like Hitler and Codreanu.

Viva Il Duce and Sieg Heil.

What the fuck?

The other movements of the interbellum period evolved independently of one another after the war, Hitler joined the DAP immediately after the war and began his political work there, the only inspiration that Musso gave was in tactics, Hitler already had the comprehensive worldview. Codreanu is no different, when he made the National Christian Socialist party he hadn't even heard of Hitler of Mussolini. The fascist movements of the interbellum period sprang out of the great war, not because of Mussolini's example

I would understand if Codreanu hadn't heard of Hitler yet, as Hitler was not in power at that time but Mussolini surely. He started to lead Italy since 1922 (not gaining full power until 1925) and even by 1925 he should've heard of Mussolini. Sure, of course they evolved independently because ofc the NSDAP didn't work with the Iron Guard in its early stages or the National Fascist Party yet. Hitler was focused on taking Germany, then going later. National Socialism was inspired by Fascism greatly and not just in tactics, in its worldview as well. Both are similar but with striking differences.

Mussolini and Italian Fascism was the source of inspiration for Fascism across Europe. It just evolved differently to suit the needs of each country.

Nazism is a bit different from Fascism but still similar in some ways.

Look at the British version of Fascism. Heavily influenced by Mussolini but as I said, evolved differently to suit Britain.

TBH the Imperial Fascist League was way better than the BUF.

>The IFL soon shifted away from Italian fascism (it originally used the fasces as its emblem) after Leese met Nazi Party propagandist Julius Streicher in Germany. Soon anti-Semitism became the central theme of IFL policy and its new programme, the 'Racial Fascist Corporate State', stressed the supremacy of the 'Aryan race'.[7] The IFL altered its flag so that it featured the Union Flag superimposed with the swastika.[3] As a result of this conversion the IFL enjoyed a higher profile than its membership might suggest, in large part due to the funding it received from Nazi Germany paid through the English correspondent for the Völkischer Beobachter Dr. Hans Wilhelm Thost.[3]

@ETERNAL_BOOMER They would have done what they did regardless of Mussolini. I meant that he set a positive example that the enemy could be defeated.

It motivated them, it didn't shape them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgFSMXNo2bs

@Deleted User well just to be historically correct, Hitler took Poland in a matter of month but he teamed up with the soviets

so we were attacked on 2 fronts lol

Fair call