https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gmBZGT32moo

https://radiowehrwolf.us/2018/07/01/siegecast-on-the-rumors-and-conspiracies/

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:o6mPmM97EKkJ:reconquista-europe.tumblr.com/post/174280406666/russian-imperial-movements-message-to-the+&cd=8&hl=sv&ct=clnk&gl=se&client=opera

Must watch:
https://youtu.be/uP1XOeW2g0Y

How hopeful is NRM about the Swedish elections? Any idea if you'll get any seats?

@Deleted User We are not naive so we don't expect "success" in relation to the mainstream parties, but it is a good tool to gain access to political arenas we are not otherwise able to spread our views in.

It also legitimizes us and is a good way to estimate popular support, but I personally doubt it is above 0,5 - 1% amongst the voting population. Then again, a lot of people I meet at school and workplaces claim they support us a lot when they find out I'm a member.

Personally I expect around 5000 votes in the country, hopefully municipal seat in Ludvika. Ideal would be to get seats in all the municipalities where we are participating in local elections, which means getting seats in Ludvika, Kungälv and Boden.

Securing some small towns is good

I think the most important thing is that people understand that NMR dosent go to elections to outright win but to show that we are a alternative. Worst thing someone could do would be to become blackpilled if we gain nothing

Defeatism is gay.

lol @Deleted User if NRM was electable they woudnt need to run

>elections

Waste of resources for no gain

ikr

Hello, how's everything people?

Voting, truly, today can only work in small communities

like village municipalities or shit like that

@Детелина☦ eh, it only seems reliable in small communities where there is no clearly established decision-makers who can be trusted to do what is best

Alexander Slavros talked about it extensively, voting on a national scale makes no sense since you dont know the people you are voting for

so in the end it comes down to choosing the best liar

☝

Socrates talked about that when he talked about his views on elitism. People tend to vote for the "sweets sellers" rather than the "doctors", since no one wants to hear the painful truth the doctor gives you.

unless an actual NS state is established I woudnt mind having a democracy like that of Switzerland, ofc it will only work if the population is racially homogenous, able to make rational decisions and of course if only adult men can vote

National Socialist Germany was a true democracy.

I'm inclined to believe democracy is impossible no matter how you organize it. Socrates was for what I understood a proponent of democracy just because he saw it as an inherent Athenian value. The democracy of the Athenians was way different than the parlamentarianism we know as "democracy" today.

@Thule it was a dictatorship my man

Sure, but he listened to his folk.

The greek meaning of the word democracy is good to keep in mind. Means "the people decide". What NS means in this context is imo "the Will of the volk". A big difference.

that doesn't mean it's a democracy at all then @Thule

@Hunter491 It's not just that you don't know them, it's also that there are clearly established dominant and merited key people around, its better if they naturally take the power they are suited for. In a very small community maybe it makes sense, since people might be nearly equally uneducated on how to run their community, so they need to base it on "Most people feel this way, so it's probably the least stupid choice"

NS Germany is gone, We should try to look for better models of governance lol

which would suit modern times

The Will of the Germans (and Aryans) met it's zenith in Hitler. He spoke the voice of all and acted with the Will of all.

Hitler manifested Germany so he was best suited to lead it

There are no better "models of governance" than the Hitlerian. Policies are arbitrary when it comes to empire building.

If a leader doesn't manifest the character and virtues of what he leads, he is not a true leader

In the end such a leader needs to rise naturally, not be elected after shelling out money on an electoral campaign and asking people to vote for him, it's just absurd

In this case even the elections in Germany that enabled Hitler were not mere elections, I mean you had open warfare in the streets between Hitlerists and opponents of all kinds

it was a battleground of force and action not a popularity contest of money and fikabröd