Hitler has predicted that a 100 years later, a new leader shall come to help us through our struggle. I predict somewhere in 2033-34 someone like Hitler will show up and save Europe from its current niggerization and Jewry.

Are you referring to "the Man to Come"?

If that's what it's called?

I never knew the name but I know what it's suppose to be about

I just have never heard of this prediction

isnt that a made up quote?

Maybe, try and find it

The Man to Come was the name of a chapter in M. Serrano's book MANU. Afaik used to refer to the Einherjar

Heinz Linge talked about it too

Supposed to be one of the last recorded words of the Fuhrer

Implying Skinheads are by default bad people. Also I agree on @ETERNAL_BOOMER statement that the people are not unifed. The reason I think NRM has been so succesfull is that it is **The** Movement. In the US especially this is a huge issue with hundreds of small 5 man groups all wanting control and to lead. I hope that one day burgers will realize that this ''unite the right'' mumbo jumbo is extremely bad for them and that there will come a dedicated group of people willing to fight left and ''right'' alike to create a strong movement.

Made up or not, there will be a new leader sometime I believe. The Jewish lies will spill out in great numbers and collapse.

Well, Linge was the personal valet to Hitler

The mainstream media uses them to tell us that this is what National Socialism, or "Neo-Nazism" is.

Skinhead =/= trash people

It is ridiculous in my opinion to separate skinheads and hooligans from the struggle, just for being violent and intimidating

Teufel is woke.

Well Jews use violence and intimidation against us, so ofc I don't mind violence and intimidation if used correctly.

There is really no correct way to use violence. You can direct it in an effective direction as a tool to gain certain goals, but violence always stands for itself.

When it comes to skins/hooligan scene there is a prejudice/stereotype that the media you talk about use. As you said, media doesn't portray NS as it truly is, but neither does it do any courtesy for the hooligan scene.

UTR lead to a lot of bad fallout

This maybe sounds weird but I think a genuine NS is equal to another as comrade no matter how it is expressed

Hooligans don't know how to articulate themselves. That's it. As soon as they're able to answer on the spot questions effectively then they're golden

Yes but that is the stereotype I am talking about

It just so happens that a lot of hooligans are dummies who don't know how to

Not an insult to you, but that is parroting media

It's not the media, I see it for myself

You know much of the NS hooligan scene?

Perhaps not the European as much but in Australia sure

God bless the Antipodean Resistance.

<:heil:449290177316388874>

That sounds to me more of an concern of how NS is perceived, not for what it *is*.

Yes God bless AR

<:heil:449290177316388874>

<:heil:449290177316388874>

To me it's a little of both.

I think there are far more important things to keep eyes on than how non-NS view NS

yes ofc

I suppose it's easy to say that, but even among us we know that C18 and BH (Blood and Honour) don't know how to publicly conduct themselves, if they did then AR wouldn't need to exist

Each fills different roles and I don't mean to take away from any of the groups in question

The greek C18 do open combat against communist and other similar groups, like burning down their clubhouses. BH is an active event organizer in Finland and are a very important propagandistic organization.