Message from @Mikko
Discord ID: 517981444753063936
Because it clouds your judgement
im annoyed by people saying annoying things
Ok, so you're not mentally liberated, not detached.
im a normal person with emotions lmao
do you not get annoyed?
its not like im frothing with rage
Do you not control your emotions?
are you implying i have anger issues or something
It appears like you are if you have to lash out at something when it's mentioned
hahahah
im typing words in a discord chat, what kind of lashing out is that?
should i just say nothing when someone says something i disagree with, like a beta male?
Your mind is clouded by emotions dude. Take a step back, detach from it and then view the subject again
sure sure
I usually take to the defense of siege because I know it is a good book filled with useful tools for the revolutionary. It is sad to see people discard it out of illogical reasons
It's like not wanting to carry a knife in your utility belt because it's used by some people to kill
i never said i discarded it
you seem to have interpreted something here thats not true
"yeah i want to hear mike tear apart james mason and siege" sounds like discarding it
ha well honestly that was bait and i got you siegetards good
TL;DR Read SIEGE
Play nice now kids 🔫
Swedish siege by Klas Lund?
This
How can national socialists even be anti siege?
Also why is it that most people who dont like siege still like turner diaries? 🤔
Turner Diaries is fiction
Yes, very good fiction
You can still learn from it too
>tfw Iron Guard was siege pilled before SIEGE arrived
All criticism of SIEGE is either insults against mason/manson, or PR reasons
Hitler would be Siege pilled if he lived in this time
Lashing out on everything thats radical or 'bad for PR' is conservative mindset, not NS
I would say that there is good stuff in siege. But there is also other shit than shooting the mailman. Also siege is partly history book for USA, not Europe. I have neutral stance on it, because it has good shit. But some people understand the book wrong and take the not-the-best parts from it.
Wasn't Manson a fucking satanist?
@Deleted User no?
So that's another bullshit spread by New Awakening fags.
How was Manson a satanist lmao, you might mistake him for Mason who also isint one
The only Satanists are the Atomwaffen fags
Manson was just a CIA op