S O C I A L I S M

Well to be fair saying isn't the same as doing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_People%27s_Welfare

I mean when you demand something...you most likely want that thing

Well

Could capitalism and totatlitarianism even work?

Maybe
Chile?

Probably not

well totalitarianism is more orwellian where the government controls every aspect of your life (similar to nazi germany)

so I don't see how it could be capitalist

Do nazi's outwardly support total control over everyday life?

I thought if you were deemed of good ethnic sound you'd get the socialist treatment but I see no mention of a surveillance state

I got the definition of totalitarianism wrong sorry

They'd implement it

its inevitable for any powerful state really

look at one nation toryism in UK, bloody cctv everywhere in London

> the Nazis found it necessary to set up charitable institutions to help racially-pure Germans in order to maintain popular support

via https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany#Social_policies line 3 sentence 2

also this thing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Labour_Front

Nazi Germany was pretty Socialist but not traditonal Marxist socialism

more social darwinism

How is it like social darwinism?

because it didn't help "inferior" races

its more like state imposed social darwinism

rather than naturally letting the races thwart each other

Social darwinsim isn't socialism

I know

Its quite the opposite

I know, but Hitler imposed social darwinist policies in a way

Social Darwinism is just a worldview

But it could easily be incorporated with libertarianism as with Nazism

if social darwinism is survival of the fittest, then I'd say capitalism is similar to social darwinism if that's what @hqjsdbsnwa is talking about

though capitalism doesn't just serve to the "strong"

Well,capitalism doesn't serve anyone,but the more competent people have it better under capitalism

it just give people total freedom to life, liberty and property

everything is done with mutual contracts and agreements that do not infringe the NAP

yeah perhaps "serve" was the wrong word, but capitalism isn't just there to the "strong" rather but to everybody

Yeah

The more competent people have it better under capitalism but theh don't have to be strong or whatever

Social Darwinism is just survival of the fittest but that isnt quite precisely quantifiable in human social life, success is subjective

Like you can be the weakest ugliest looking dude in the world but if ur smart you can have a better life and more money than some strong attactice guy under capitalism