mormon revelation

given to J. Smith

Lol

Fuck that

no

Yea

it is plain and simple truth

Canaan came from Noahs wife, so he was Adamic

imagine thinking that ham had sex with his mother

He did

clearly not what the bible was saying

Thats why canaan got the curse

It says that

Ham saw his fathers nakedness

and somehow seeing his father's nakedness means he had sex with his mother

It does

yeah, sure mate

Its the same way it says in Leviticus

Ok, fuck off

never !

Leviticus 18:8
[8]The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness.

Nigga

Its explained clearly

6 None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness: I am the Lord.
7 The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
8 The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.
excluding the prior verses as if the only law is in the 8th verse conceals some of the truth

and it's clear that ham did what is described in verse 7

not verse 8

I admit, it could be verse 8

but don't find much truth to that interpretation

Of course the beastial mediterranid wants to deny the simple truths of the gospel in relation to the curse of canaan

Nigga has Electra complex

u mean oedipus?

electra is for women

Idk his sex nigga

u think there are women here?

“Incidentally the story of the stolen garment as told by the rabbis, including the great Eleazer, calls for an entirely different rendering of the strange story in Genesis [9] from the version in our King James Bible. They seemed to think that the ’erwath of Genesis [9:22] did not mean ‘nakedness’ at all, but should be given its primary root meaning of ‘skin covering.’ Read thus, we are to understand that Ham
took the garment of his father while he was sleeping and showed it to his brethren, Shem and Japheth, who took a pattern or copy of it (salmah) or else a woven garment like it (simlah) which they put upon their own shoulders, returning the skin garment to their father. Upon awaking, Noah recognized the priesthood of two sons but cursed the son who tried to rob him of his garment.” (Lehi in the Desert and the World of Jaredites, pp. 160–62.)
Therefore, although Ham himself had the right to the priesthood, Canaan, his son, did not. Ham had married Egyptus, a descendant of Cain (Abraham 1:21–24), and so his sons were denied the priesthood.” -Hugh Nibley

I hoped there were

@freeman yet noah cursed Canaan

Yeah fuck ur american "prophets" lmao

hugh nibley was never a prophet

he's literally just a scholar