and when that slave dies you're guaranteed to need to replace it which obviously is costly unless you go for trashy slaves

Yes ofc its more efficient but its also a stressful job which u dont want to do

innovations negated the need for needing slaves to pick cotton

What about the jews in nazi germany

you're comparing a war economy to an agrarian economy,

jews in nazi germany were mostly geared to the war effort iirc

Wtf when did i mean agrarian economy

Yes

And

Dont over complicate it

i assumed since that was when it was the most profitable until technologies made it no longer favorable

an economy geared to war and an economy geared to wealth are two different things

Are you trying to argue that slavery wasn't profitable??? lmao

im saying that slavery isn't efficient in a modern scenario

it is profitable but its profitability was severed over time

Between genocide and slavery, slavery is the better option. It definitively is not a deficit

Putting niggers to do hard labor until they all die is better than killing them all

Its not a deficit, its a gain

ok sure but you're just jacking off to something that'll never happen

No?

Uyghurs?

literally who cares

Near slavery conditions and straight up slavery is still practiced till this day even by mega corps lol

>he believes in the uighur death camps

Omfg

in the form of capital which is why its vastly superior

There where slave camps here in argentina which payed their slaves

Its still slavery

What you just said slavery isn't profitable or efficient in a modern scenario

yeah applications of slavery prior and modern day are different

Wish Maggie had nuked you lot tbh

@Briar argies?

😂 😂 😂 😂

call it modern-day slavery when it really isnt is just arguing over the arbitrariness of conditions that the labor is performed

How do u call it

No it has practically remained the same throughout the ages

When you force people to work in shitty conditions and segregated

Forced

Its slavery

Even if different

Obv you dont put them in cotton fields