Now see, that seems logical, but how in the hell could we discern that for certain? I wish there was some type of hard number we could review and go off of instead of having to resort to multiple different contrasting figures.

http://www.wfaa.com/article/news/local/from-the-archive-the-dallas-st-patricks-day-parade-50-years-ago/287-529484285?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=5aae018e04d30156f431c3e2&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter

It hurts...

I think we need to post about Mike Enoch since he will go down in history as the savior of the white race

Michael “Shark Eyes” Peinovich, God King of The Ethnostate, and Eternal Autarch of Awkwardly Holding Ranch Dressing

American revolution was completely unjustified t b q h

Britain almost bankrupted itself during the 7 years war getting the territory the colonists asked for

and when the tax rate in the colony goes up (still far lower than that in England) to pay off this debt they sperg out and declare independence

granted it all turned out great for the Americans in the end

(they hold world hegemony, foremost power etc)

but the entire revolution was unwarranted

imo

no

American revolution was to protect the liberties against the Westminster absoutism

And the American identity

Americans self-identified as Americans rather than British decades before the revolution

that's a bit of a generalisation, many colonists saw themselves as english transplanted to the Americas

sure some of them adopted a national identity when and after the revolution

happened

but a lot of them (for example the loyalists who moved to canada) considered themselves british first

after the revolution, loyalists migrated (actually got kicked out) to Canada

sure

but that was after the revolution took place

this is the conflict of identity

talking about the initial reasons for it

no way than actions of warfare can solve it

it will happen sooner or later

Americans will never be willing to vote for some representatives in Westminster

none of those living in the colonies wanted direct rule, but they were willing to wait for devolved powers to be granted to them

the Canadians, Australians and kiwis got dominion status sometime in the 30s

they didn't use violence to try and take those powers

fair enough, the Americans did

i just don't think it was worth spilling the blood of their fellows over

at first it is quite mild

but all the time things suddenly got heated

like explosion

no one planned a revolution from the beginning

but in the end, it had to be like this

i'd agree with that

the countries under britain's control only remained there for so long as britain had the power to keep them

as soon as british power waned every colony was pushing for independence or more autonomy