we call it 8mm masuer

i need to pick up some 8mm mauser again

havent fed my turk mauser in a long time

@Joe the boomer also i forgot to post a pic of my enfield, i know its been a long ass time but ill post a pic tomorrow

nice

i got a crate of romainain masuer somewhere in storage

ready for war

preserved in air tight sealed spam cans

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpQPUpY8UO8 @Joe the boomer

AR is better for modern combat than AK fight me

neither is superior

both have ups and down

http://www.wmcactionnews5.com/story/38330717/homeowner-shoots-kills-2-burglars-with-ak-47

ar is superior. 70gr 55/223 delivers 641 ft/lbs vs 123gr 762's 470 ft/lbs @350 yrds. 55/223 is more accurate. is traveling faster. Is dropping less. Penetrates better. Both are as reliable clean but I've seen ar's pass mud test on youtube where ak's fail. ar does a better job keeping debris out of it's action. It's bad rep in vietnam came from it's not yet understood ammo preference and poor gov maintenance/deployment. Why you would want a worse gun, with worse ammo, with worse reliability, is beyond me. "ak is better" is based on internet myths. Granted I wouldn't want to be shot at with 762 or any cal, all of that aside, the ar performs better real life

nice copy pasta, lol neither is superior. the ak being inaccurate is a retarded myth and needs to stay dead ive seen hundreds of ARs fail mud tests and water tests it means nothing except that bullshit spreads .300 yards and in drop on the 762 is negligible for a semi competent marksmen.the 556/223 only penetrates noticeably(VS say body armor) better if the barrel length is more than 18.5 inches somewhere around 20 inches(Vietnam era m16s are 22 i think) or more, most ARs are not 20 inches .

when the barrels are shorter this leads to a massive decrease in performance (the rounds dont achieve desired speeds and ice pic on soft targets causing little damage) not to mention that light high velocity rounds like the 223/556 has terrible performance in brush and canopy like forest terrain being so light and fast when the bullet so much as hits a leaf or two it throws the ballistics out of the window and goes of its course.

and as for the "muh cousins brother has seen vidyas on utube of aks failing mudtest when ar supreme hurrrrdurrrr "
yeah who cares there are loads of substandard US domestic AKs being made here in the states and flooded into the market with garbage pot metal components its something that doesnt happen with decent combloc made AKs with milspec components the truth is the market is flooded with sub standard garbage 500 dollar ARs and AKs .AR or AK being better should be chalked up to retarded fanboys . there are legitimate and valid criticisms of the ak platform compared to the AR such as carrying less ammo due to weight

yeah

this doesnt suprise me kek

never take advice from someone whos avatar looks like this

self pwned lol

Oh the substandard American ak argument. Real Russian ak's work the same. You're fanboying hard in leu of facts. I have experience with an AMD65 breaking down with little fouling. Your childish post without any data just self owned. Nothing you say can magically make an ak perform better. As for the platform it's less reliable. As for the cartridge the Russians necked down to 5.45 because they understood the ballistic advantage later on. Anything else dumb to say?

fugging lol

reeeee ak vs ar fight

"data"

ya check the ballistic sheets again broy

heres my data

now stop cloggin up this chat with your shit teir trolling ak vs ar shit

<:virgin:402360028528377868>

u can stop now i deleted those to save you some face

you still don't check the ballistic charts

we're done

reeeee

pete delte rn

meme me it makes the ak better

joe the sperg

joe is king here enjoy your stay kid!

LEL