Message from @crusty
Discord ID: 457379457724973078
fugly
they have a spring unlike the magpuls that i use
so you press the button and it pops up
the magpuls i have are steel and you actually have to flip em up yourself
honestly i don't like the springs set up... more chance of them breaking
yeagh one more thing that can go wrong
i have alot of historical peices and it gives you an amazing appreciation for older western nation craftsmanship
Not once this moron gets a gun pulled on him while trying to car-jack, but twice....
@Joe the boomer The only historical firearm I have is a 1942 Walther P38... Really nice gun. Happens to be in near perfect condition.
I love the P38 almost as much as the original Luger, nice
very nice gun
and the fact that it has German markings on it is very triggering which is an added bonus
i have a kar98k in my collection with all matching numbers and its original nazi inspector stamp markings on it
very nice gun
how much is 7.92 ammo these days?
thats what it is chambered in right?
I'm getting bombarded by 6 gorillion emails with Fathers Day "sales" from gun shops.... and I am yet to see something that is really a deep enough sale to bite...
we call it 8mm masuer
havent fed my turk mauser in a long time
@Joe the boomer also i forgot to post a pic of my enfield, i know its been a long ass time but ill post a pic tomorrow
nice
i got a crate of romainain masuer somewhere in storage
ready for war
preserved in air tight sealed spam cans
AR is better for modern combat than AK fight me
neither is superior
both have ups and down
ar is superior. 70gr 55/223 delivers 641 ft/lbs vs 123gr 762's 470 ft/lbs @350 yrds. 55/223 is more accurate. is traveling faster. Is dropping less. Penetrates better. Both are as reliable clean but I've seen ar's pass mud test on youtube where ak's fail. ar does a better job keeping debris out of it's action. It's bad rep in vietnam came from it's not yet understood ammo preference and poor gov maintenance/deployment. Why you would want a worse gun, with worse ammo, with worse reliability, is beyond me. "ak is better" is based on internet myths. Granted I wouldn't want to be shot at with 762 or any cal, all of that aside, the ar performs better real life
nice copy pasta, lol neither is superior. the ak being inaccurate is a retarded myth and needs to stay dead ive seen hundreds of ARs fail mud tests and water tests it means nothing except that bullshit spreads .300 yards and in drop on the 762 is negligible for a semi competent marksmen.the 556/223 only penetrates noticeably(VS say body armor) better if the barrel length is more than 18.5 inches somewhere around 20 inches(Vietnam era m16s are 22 i think) or more, most ARs are not 20 inches .
when the barrels are shorter this leads to a massive decrease in performance (the rounds dont achieve desired speeds and ice pic on soft targets causing little damage) not to mention that light high velocity rounds like the 223/556 has terrible performance in brush and canopy like forest terrain being so light and fast when the bullet so much as hits a leaf or two it throws the ballistics out of the window and goes of its course.
and as for the "muh cousins brother has seen vidyas on utube of aks failing mudtest when ar supreme hurrrrdurrrr "
yeah who cares there are loads of substandard US domestic AKs being made here in the states and flooded into the market with garbage pot metal components its something that doesnt happen with decent combloc made AKs with milspec components the truth is the market is flooded with sub standard garbage 500 dollar ARs and AKs .AR or AK being better should be chalked up to retarded fanboys . there are legitimate and valid criticisms of the ak platform compared to the AR such as carrying less ammo due to weight
yeah
this doesnt suprise me kek
never take advice from someone whos avatar looks like this
self pwned lol
