from Libcucks to esoteric Super-Fascists

Who says he's the leader other than the MSM?

I don't personally know anyone who considers him a leader. Everyone I know thinks he's controlled opposition.

@Nothing again, you're going with "he pursues a policy which is harmful to whites, therefore he cannot be pro-white". Will you accept the generalisation of this which means that anyone who pursues a policy which is harmful to the white race is necessarily not pro-white?

Who says he is the leader?

@Nothing being your nominal leader does not give him control over the people

@Nothing alright, and now I'm saying that I'm the leader

that puts me one for one against ol' Dicky

Isn't that what I've just been doing in this conversation?

anywho, back to the point
you're refuting someone's aim with the results of their action, which is retarded

The Alternative Right, commonly known as the Alt-Right, is a set of far-right ideologies, groups and individuals whose core belief is that “white identity” is under attack by multicultural forces using “political correctness” and “social justice” to undermine white people and “their” civilization.

Nearly every online resource says this. Just because alt right.com says he's the leader, doesn't mean he is

Hat about TWP? Van guard america

Are they not also altright?

I dont think the people who own a domain get to decide everything about a movement, and altright.com looks pretty white nationalist to me regardless

i dont know where youre going with this

That's a bit of a stretch

hes right

no, action and wrds are two different things

He's still bringing people towards white nationalism, you're still just killing a dog

@Nothing you're fucking retarded
the difference is that one you're doing knowingly and one you're doing out of ignorance

I say again: Hitler was anti-white because he failed

how is he doing that, the neocons are opposed to him, theyre not white nationalist or any kind of nationalists

and you could say his actions lead to that because of his failures in ww2

Does Matthew heimbach call Richard Spencer his leader?

But by the definition of alt right he's still considered alt right? Correct?

The only person moving the goal-posts is you, the basis of your entire argument is that one guy in the alt-right has some questionable opinions

Is he actually in favor of homosexuality and race-mixing, can I get a run-down?

Because he coined the term?

@Nothing No, Hitler was saying "Hey man, you know what would really save the white race? [Insert WW2 plans]."
Both objectively wrong.

There's a new term now, Uberwhites, and all white people are members and I'm their leader

@Nothing in control in what way?

which allows him to control the people how?

So, the movement doesn't stand for their common goals and defining features, it stands for how effective or not their leader is?

Pretty much everything I know about the alt-right comes from listneing to Fash the Nation and the Daily Shoah, am I doing it wrong?

So because one man speaks publically, he decides how the movement feels?

No, he may be swaying public opinion but it doesn't change the core of the group

The only thing I can find calling Richard Spencer the leader of the alt right is a HuffPo article

Is that where you're getting this?

Not at all, I'm trying to figure out where you are gathering he's the leader. Just because he owns the domain and coined the term.

@Orchid yes, you should get your info on the group from verified journos on twitter, not the most influential thought-leaders within the group