Message from @P14

Discord ID: 374972598255353866


2017-10-31 17:18:19 UTC  

Fascism isnt racist is such a kosher world view

2017-10-31 17:18:23 UTC  

^

2017-10-31 17:18:29 UTC  

Its sickening

2017-10-31 17:18:43 UTC  

Ok then what of the Romans?

2017-10-31 17:18:46 UTC  

The "natural order" is not necessarily something good in itself. It just needs to be taken into account when building a society. Otherwise it's a logical fallacy.

2017-10-31 17:19:01 UTC  

Following the natural order does not sound good to me in that regard.

2017-10-31 17:19:27 UTC  

Read the myth of the 20th century, rosenberg states the mixing of europeam blood caused the fall of the romans, also there was race laws in rome

2017-10-31 17:19:58 UTC  
2017-10-31 17:20:32 UTC  

And I've stated plenty of arguments. None of which you've even touched on. You just post more iron march bs that has no actual basis in reality or history

2017-10-31 17:20:39 UTC  

And I've read it

2017-10-31 17:21:10 UTC  

The history of fascism is racial, rome had racial hierarchy according to rosenberg

2017-10-31 17:21:44 UTC  

Correlation =/= Causation

2017-10-31 17:21:53 UTC  

In regards to the romans

2017-10-31 17:22:18 UTC  

So the founder of modern fascism declared it racial, its predecessor was racial, what more do you want

2017-10-31 17:22:47 UTC  

He didn't declare it racial from the statements you have given me

2017-10-31 17:23:19 UTC  

If he meant to do that, he could have said it more clearly

2017-10-31 17:25:21 UTC  

Mussolini was concerned with the low birth rates of the white race in contrast to the African and Asian races. In 1928 he noted the high birth-rate of blacks in the United States, and that they had surpassed the population of whites in certain areas, such as Harlem in New York City. He described their greater racial consciousness in comparison with American whites as contributing to their growing strength.

2017-10-31 17:25:59 UTC  

You still haven't shown that it's part of fascism, only that it's part of Mussolinis thinking

2017-10-31 17:26:57 UTC  

Multiracial authoritarianism is communism lad

2017-10-31 17:27:14 UTC  

The only possible argument you could make is saying that ideologies evolve.

2017-10-31 17:28:20 UTC  

I think all of you are forgetting the basic fact that collectivism as a whole is cancer and that the Nazi's views on race were barely scientific and very misconceived.

2017-10-31 17:28:43 UTC  

^christcuck is am anti racist

2017-10-31 17:28:56 UTC  

I'd argue against Fascism as well as National Socialism.

2017-10-31 17:36:07 UTC  

where did i ever say i did not believe in different races?

2017-10-31 17:36:17 UTC  

Actually the nazis in the third Reich were leaps and bounds ahead of the rest of the world in the realm of science and eugenics

2017-10-31 17:37:19 UTC  

is the Nationalist Socialist "race realism" the only true one? kind of sounds like the "settled science" argument.

2017-10-31 17:38:13 UTC  

@Thomas Morrow thats why i said their views were very misconceived.

2017-10-31 17:38:13 UTC  

You can be a race realist without being a national socialist. I'm a national socialist because I believe it to be the best system

2017-10-31 17:38:56 UTC  

You also said they were barely scientific- which I contest

2017-10-31 17:41:07 UTC  

yes, with what methods and knowledge we have now in comparison to theirs they were very pseudoscientific.

2017-10-31 17:42:05 UTC  

In what way?

2017-10-31 17:42:46 UTC  

Mengele was a genius

2017-10-31 17:46:10 UTC  

they did what a good amount of modern day "scientists" do, they misconstrued data, came up with ridiculous terms and classifications, etc.

mengele was sadist retard.

2017-10-31 17:50:13 UTC  

You're mistaken, sir. Given time they'd be way ahead of where we are now.

2017-10-31 17:52:12 UTC  

They were able to discover more because there was less restrictions. You don't have to like him but he was a genius

2017-10-31 17:53:23 UTC  

yes, i think that is a possibility as well, the only problem here is that there are still idiots out there who believe in science from 70+ years ago and see it as "settled", they are unwilling to except any new scientific discoveries that have come since.

2017-10-31 17:53:48 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/359509262872870912/374979287012605962/logo96.png

2017-10-31 17:54:00 UTC  

Sometimes the myth is greater than the actual

2017-10-31 17:54:23 UTC  

I'd agree to an extent. What way are you meaning in this context? @Belisarius