Message from @P14
Discord ID: 374971478891823126
Mussolini said so himself
If a system leaves out racialism then it leaves out a key component to natural order.
What?
In before more made up iron march swill
Not an argument
>inb4 more things that contradict me
Fascism isnt racist is such a kosher world view
^
Its sickening
Ok then what of the Romans?
The "natural order" is not necessarily something good in itself. It just needs to be taken into account when building a society. Otherwise it's a logical fallacy.
Following the natural order does not sound good to me in that regard.
Read the myth of the 20th century, rosenberg states the mixing of europeam blood caused the fall of the romans, also there was race laws in rome
And I've stated plenty of arguments. None of which you've even touched on. You just post more iron march bs that has no actual basis in reality or history
And I've read it
The history of fascism is racial, rome had racial hierarchy according to rosenberg
Correlation =/= Causation
In regards to the romans
So the founder of modern fascism declared it racial, its predecessor was racial, what more do you want
If he meant to do that, he could have said it more clearly
Mussolini was concerned with the low birth rates of the white race in contrast to the African and Asian races. In 1928 he noted the high birth-rate of blacks in the United States, and that they had surpassed the population of whites in certain areas, such as Harlem in New York City. He described their greater racial consciousness in comparison with American whites as contributing to their growing strength.
You still haven't shown that it's part of fascism, only that it's part of Mussolinis thinking
Multiracial authoritarianism is communism lad
The only possible argument you could make is saying that ideologies evolve.
I think all of you are forgetting the basic fact that collectivism as a whole is cancer and that the Nazi's views on race were barely scientific and very misconceived.
^christcuck is am anti racist
I'd argue against Fascism as well as National Socialism.
where did i ever say i did not believe in different races?
Actually the nazis in the third Reich were leaps and bounds ahead of the rest of the world in the realm of science and eugenics
is the Nationalist Socialist "race realism" the only true one? kind of sounds like the "settled science" argument.
@Thomas Morrow thats why i said their views were very misconceived.
You can be a race realist without being a national socialist. I'm a national socialist because I believe it to be the best system
You also said they were barely scientific- which I contest
yes, with what methods and knowledge we have now in comparison to theirs they were very pseudoscientific.
In what way?
Mengele was a genius
they did what a good amount of modern day "scientists" do, they misconstrued data, came up with ridiculous terms and classifications, etc.
mengele was sadist retard.