Message from @ram3n
Discord ID: 370404990210015232
cya
Has anyone considered the Burnham Master Plan?
Shame it didn't work out
Some notes I have on government roles in a free society
- The preservation of freedom requires the elimination of concentrations of power to the fullest possible extent and the dispersal and distribution of whatever power cannot be eliminated - a system of checks and balances.
- There are some matters in which proportional representation is impossible thus we must discuss, argue and vote. But having made a decision there must be conformity. If the use of resources for such indivisible cases becomes necessary then we must employ political channels to reconcile the differences.
- Unfortunately the use of political channels tends to strain the social cohesion essential for a stable society. The strain is least if agreement for joint action need be reached only on a limited range of issues on which people in any event have common views. Every extension of the range of issues for which explicit agreement is sought strains further the delicate threads that hold society together. If it goes so far as to touch an issue on which men feel deeply yet differently, it may well disrupt the society.
- Fundamental differences in basic values can seldom if ever be resolved at the ballot box; ultimately they can only be decided, by conflict.
- The widespread use of the market reduces the strain on the social fabric by rendering conformity unnecessary with respect to any activities it encompasses. The wider the range of activities covered by the market, the fewer are the issues on which explicitly political decisions are required and hence on which it is necessary to achieve agreement. In turn, the fewer the issues on which agreement is necessary, the greater is the likelihood of getting agreement while maintaining a free society.
- Society requires that its members agree on the general conditions that will govern relations among them. Enforcing compliance on the accepted rules and interpreting arbitrary situations.
- Rules cannot prevail unless most participants conform to them most of the time but there can’t be a reliance on the conformity.
- Men’s Freedom can conflict, and when they do, it must be acknowledged that one man’s freedom must be limited to preserve another’s.
It kind of did work out, though. Most of the lakefront is public property, and we have a very well defined grid system in place.
He just didn't anticipate cars
Chicago is a really cool place to visit as a tourist
And honestly, it's not as bad to live in, as long as you live in white areas.
Which there are plenty of.
How not to found your ethnostate:
>“We came here to live as human beings…. free of the corporations that [control] countries…. we’re human beings, we belong in the sun. I belong in the tropics. I’m a tropical human being, you cannot stop me from being on the earth. I don’t belong to Costa Rica….. I don’t belong to America…. I belong to the earth”
>Too woke to obtain a visa
why are they in jail?
"we belong in the sun"
tards
literally
@Orchid they relocated to Costa Rica without bothering to obtain legal visas
Because citizenship is an oppressive white social construct
lol
>literally have an entire continent upon which they can found an ethnostate
>Move to the most developed, westernized country in Central America, because We Waz Taíno-Carib Seafarers
WE WUZ KANGS N SHIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET
Asking again, has any specific location in the northwest been discussed at all as far as the start of the homesteading?
some have been talked about, i suggest scrolling up to read some of the past conversations
Will do.
The columbia valley in BC is very good.
Wouldn't Alaska be better for large land buys? More isolated and if we're smart with greenhouse farms we should be able to farm 365 days a year
If you're doing Alaska you may as well do the Yukon where land is free.