Message from @Capitán Alatriste
Discord ID: 647124255762415616
Well yeah
And the population back then wasn't that much
That's pretty fucking substantial
Every brainlet who took American history knows about the cucking cornwallis suffered at the hands of pitchfork wielding peasants
And sharpshooting rural folk
OG guerilla warfighters
And when they tried again, when America was by itself they still lost
When will you britbongs learn you can't win <:shap:497652686603288576>
And then 100 years later "Little brother, pls help us. The jerries are kicking our ass <:TripleMonkas:491962237938827264>
Maybe the solution to gun confiscation is creating local armories
All I have is my lady Smith and Remington 870. All those other scary military guns got lost in a boating accident <:MLady:577064881040130059>
Sad!
In short, get rebuked globohomo Spaniard
Based
Nah
<:boomer:514203388704063489>
@Son of Rome But really, local armories and organized militia training is a good show of force and a solution.
Then, if the police come to confiscate one guys gun, they have to break in to the place storing everyone's guns
And then you pull a Lexington and ambush them in a kill box
<:deadass:560215324167897128>
I'm interested in how the revolution of 2024 will play out
The militia during the first stages of the war was nothing but a liability for the cause. They ran at the first sight of British troops and lacked the discipline to hold the line. In contrast with the continental army, the militias could come and go as they pleased and were not bound to fight, so when things got difficult such as in Valley Forge, they simply returned home. Moreover they were keen to plunder, something which displeased the officers of the continental army. The only times the militia was able to stand was when accompanied with regular continental soldiers which would hold the line.
As the war progressed the usefulness of militia did increase, but not as a result of direct contact but as auxiliaries and in support roles as they could not be relied upon for more. Towards the end of the war they could hold their ground against regular british troops when led by experienced officers, but only in small skirmishes and battles.
While they were an important factor to the cause, they were not the decisive factor in winning the war. What won the war was the professionalisation of the Continental army, as well as the crucial supplies and military support by the US allies.
Ok
Thanks for telling us our own history lol
You're welcome
Except local militias did play a large part in harassing the British army as it moved through American territory. American sharpshooters were able to take out experienced British officers and overall hamper the British as they moved to engage the American army or take American cities. A good example was after the battle of Lexington and Concord when they harrased the British all the way back to Boston.
@-5K- It's like trying to explain why the jews are evil to a neocon, just not gonna happen
Let him think he's right ❤️
wow
what a shithole
what does that area look like now?
No, but the walls are still there
Wow bro. Thats kinda cringe....
"Heavy tank", doesnt even have light armor
Made from melted down church bells
