Message from @IXI
Discord ID: 641884157991190538
References
↵Hansen SN, Schendel DE, Parner ET (2015) Explaining the increase in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: The proportion attributable to changes in reporting practices. JAMA Pediatr
jama really
Yes chlorine in the water makes the water toxic. And we absorb quite a lot of it
got any others who are not funded by big pharma
If the only issue you can find is "one of the references is published in a journal I don't like" you should try harder
JAMA, AAP etc all bs propaganda
come on man, this isn't funded by big pharma. This was funded by Ted Lindsay Foundation, SafeMinds, National Autism Association, and the Johnson and Vernick families
@Sloan Jask i dont need to try harder my sources dont have a conflict of interest
@Sloan Jask it is if they use references from jama really
Gadad et al doesn't either. You just proved my point that you fabricate conflicts of interest whenever you don't like the findings
then they are not doing the ressearch are they
lol jama is more bs that is all you got ?
you don't have to be ashamed of your own biases, everyone has them, but you shouldn't let them force you to have to make stuff up
@Sloan Jask would you still say vaccines are harmless if you personally know children who got seizures a few hours after a vaccine and ended up with permanent brain damage
yes
↵American Pyschiatric Association (2013) Desk Reference to the Daignostic Criteria from DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC), 5th Ed.
Would you care what study they show you
another joke
yes
Well okay
also one of their references
did they do any of their own tests???
does not seem so
like i said you post bs that pushes the government narrative
and government is lobbied by big pharma all the time
Even my parents who are very pro vaxx and i disagree with everything they say about health, said vaccines are not harmless the moment they saw the kids of their good friends get seizures and autism as a result of vaccination
if you even know how elections work
you still have not figured it out yet it is all about the money
mercury was the cheap alternative for a preservative
and a new condition was created to cover it up
yea that company is garbage sucking in the ppl money for a fake condition
so your issue with the paper is the journals that publishes the papers cited in the references?
even trying to get donations for something we already know the cause for
If you're just going to try to force the conversation away from this study, go ahead but don't think it'll make you look good
if you have legitimate issue with the experiment, raise them
@Sloan Jask umm what study they did nothing
that is a garbage web site lol
its references are shit