Message from @IXI

Discord ID: 641884032967245864


2019-11-07 06:12:37 UTC  

rhesus macaques are frequently used to study neurological toxicity. they're one of the best models we have

2019-11-07 06:13:10 UTC  

fine! table salt contains chlorine. Chlorine is a toxic element. table salt is not

2019-11-07 06:13:26 UTC  

It actually is

2019-11-07 06:13:42 UTC  

But in the amounts we take it we are fine

2019-11-07 06:13:48 UTC  

same with water

2019-11-07 06:13:57 UTC  

Eat a pound of saly youd end up in a hospital

2019-11-07 06:14:21 UTC  

@Sloan Jask very first reference is garbage as usual

2019-11-07 06:14:25 UTC  

References
↵Hansen SN, Schendel DE, Parner ET (2015) Explaining the increase in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: The proportion attributable to changes in reporting practices. JAMA Pediatr

2019-11-07 06:14:30 UTC  

jama really

2019-11-07 06:14:33 UTC  

Yes chlorine in the water makes the water toxic. And we absorb quite a lot of it

2019-11-07 06:15:16 UTC  

got any others who are not funded by big pharma

2019-11-07 06:15:34 UTC  

If the only issue you can find is "one of the references is published in a journal I don't like" you should try harder

2019-11-07 06:15:43 UTC  

JAMA, AAP etc all bs propaganda

2019-11-07 06:15:59 UTC  

come on man, this isn't funded by big pharma. This was funded by Ted Lindsay Foundation, SafeMinds, National Autism Association, and the Johnson and Vernick families

2019-11-07 06:16:22 UTC  

@Sloan Jask i dont need to try harder my sources dont have a conflict of interest

2019-11-07 06:16:46 UTC  

@Sloan Jask it is if they use references from jama really

2019-11-07 06:16:56 UTC  

Gadad et al doesn't either. You just proved my point that you fabricate conflicts of interest whenever you don't like the findings

2019-11-07 06:17:04 UTC  

then they are not doing the ressearch are they

2019-11-07 06:17:42 UTC  

lol jama is more bs that is all you got ?

2019-11-07 06:17:55 UTC  

you don't have to be ashamed of your own biases, everyone has them, but you shouldn't let them force you to have to make stuff up

2019-11-07 06:17:59 UTC  

@Sloan Jask would you still say vaccines are harmless if you personally know children who got seizures a few hours after a vaccine and ended up with permanent brain damage

2019-11-07 06:18:08 UTC  

yes

2019-11-07 06:18:10 UTC  

↵American Pyschiatric Association (2013) Desk Reference to the Daignostic Criteria from DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC), 5th Ed.

2019-11-07 06:18:12 UTC  

Would you care what study they show you

2019-11-07 06:18:14 UTC  

another joke

2019-11-07 06:18:20 UTC  

yes

2019-11-07 06:18:26 UTC  

Well okay

2019-11-07 06:18:28 UTC  

Your an idiot

2019-11-07 06:18:54 UTC  

also one of their references

2019-11-07 06:19:04 UTC  

did they do any of their own tests???

2019-11-07 06:19:13 UTC  

does not seem so

2019-11-07 06:19:45 UTC  

like i said you post bs that pushes the government narrative

2019-11-07 06:20:01 UTC  

and government is lobbied by big pharma all the time

2019-11-07 06:20:11 UTC  

Even my parents who are very pro vaxx and i disagree with everything they say about health, said vaccines are not harmless the moment they saw the kids of their good friends get seizures and autism as a result of vaccination

2019-11-07 06:20:13 UTC  

if you even know how elections work

2019-11-07 06:20:33 UTC  

you still have not figured it out yet it is all about the money

2019-11-07 06:20:59 UTC  

mercury was the cheap alternative for a preservative

2019-11-07 06:21:16 UTC  

and a new condition was created to cover it up

2019-11-07 06:22:40 UTC  

yea that company is garbage sucking in the ppl money for a fake condition

2019-11-07 06:22:53 UTC  

so your issue with the paper is the journals that publishes the papers cited in the references?