Message from @Wretch
Discord ID: 641885663926419457
Well okay
Your an idiot
also one of their references
did they do any of their own tests???
does not seem so
like i said you post bs that pushes the government narrative
and government is lobbied by big pharma all the time
Even my parents who are very pro vaxx and i disagree with everything they say about health, said vaccines are not harmless the moment they saw the kids of their good friends get seizures and autism as a result of vaccination
if you even know how elections work
you still have not figured it out yet it is all about the money
mercury was the cheap alternative for a preservative
and a new condition was created to cover it up
yea that company is garbage sucking in the ppl money for a fake condition
so your issue with the paper is the journals that publishes the papers cited in the references?
even trying to get donations for something we already know the cause for
If you're just going to try to force the conversation away from this study, go ahead but don't think it'll make you look good
if you have legitimate issue with the experiment, raise them
@Sloan Jask umm what study they did nothing
its references are shit
they administered TCVs to rhesus macaques and did post mortems looked for neurological abnormalities seen in autism
so your issue is the references???
national academy of sciences lol
Wait how is that a good study its on non humans
Who cares
they are pushing the propaganda lol
they have too
it's unethical to test a drug you hypothesise to be dangerous on human. This species has been used EXTENSIVELY to study neurological toxicities
funny how you trust these government funded organizations
If you think studies on animals are in any way good ones then there are thousands on rats, cats and other animals that prove vaccines harmful.
the study is funded by Ted Lindsay Foundation, SafeMinds, National Autism Association, and the Johnson and Vernick families
yea did you look at who funds them
hahahaha
like i said
your sources are garbage
Just because its unethical doesnt make this a good study
Regardless of who funds its a bad study
why?
who they have worked for in the past is also a big one lol