Im gonna guess zero

@Say once again....? The subject matter ISNT biology. It's morality. Your EXPERTISE is forcing you to put on your blinders and only argue what you want to argue and NOT the subject matter. If you can't adhere to the point at hand, please don't try to sabotage the discussion with your strawman positions.

Ok boomer

You wouldn't barge into nasa headquarters with no knowledge of propulsion and demand that they rebuild their propulsion system to your specifications

@Say how many morality classes have you taken?

I’ve taken plenty of philosophy classes and i can guarantee I’ve read more books on it than you

Doctors have to go through ethics classes so quite a few hours worth I imagune

^

Ethics isn't morality. Neither is philosophy. Next.

Boomer moment

The noun for morality is ethics

“Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental questions[5][6][7] about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language.”

( used with a plural verb ) moral principles, as of an individual:His ethics forbade betrayal of a confidence.

( used with a singular verb ) that branch of philosophy dealing with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions.

So tell me again ethics and morality are not the same

I imagine, in your arrogance, you seem to think that spewing forth "statistics" and "biology" can be inserted into any conversation that is unrelated to that and that you feel it's relevant. But, anyone who knows about this subject matter would realize that all of your supposed experiences are not relevant and only serve to distract and are used as tools for those who choose to not discuss honestly.

@Mattie ethics and morality are not the same.

Ok boomer

Ok boomer

Have fun with the knowledge that all of academia laughs at you

@Say @Mattie

See....in all your infinite wisdom, the best you can come up with is the (as you both self avow, one a doctor and one with 146 IQ) "OK boomer" trope? Something doesn't fit.

*,I'm such a great intellectual, but I need to resort to stupid insults*
Yeah, riiiiight.

I'm glad to see that both of you had to resort to breaking down the discussion into semantics. I think it shows how disingenuous you both are.

You know things are going to go NOWHERE with stunted people when they start throwing out definitions they copy and paste from someplace and aren't brave enough to define their own terms, since that is how they're using them in the first place. Just more proof that they can't separate from their ego (which is just another way to say bias).

So, smell ya later.

Ok boomer

Ok normie

@Say lol i dont think your a doctor hahaha you could not even read a simple graph

noticed how you avoided my 9 questions too

We made it clear that we were talking about different graphs

And i could answer all of them or explain how the questions are ridiculous

answer away then

question 1. Google is your friend. You can go to clinicaltrials.gov right now and search for "vaccine". Here, I'll help you out https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=vaccine&term=&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=

cause there have never been a double blind placebo ever done

I get 7,145 results

no one has ever answered any of those questions EVER

I just answered one

no you didnt

show me the double blind study done then on any vaccine

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=vaccine&term=&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=
here's 7,145

not a double blind study showing their safety try again