!mute @Tell me lies

@GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE
All you said was, "you're wrong", without any supporting factual evidence. Can you repair that, or will you continue with your same tact?

I'm not the one with burden of proof

He is the one making ridiculous propositions, and showed nothing to support it except an article from an anti vaxx website with some things in all caps

Caps is not truth believe it or not

Well, that's not how it works. @Wretch HAS supplied factual evidence to back their claim. Your rebuttal, to the claim made, has been "you're wrong", which now is a claim and puts a reverse onus on you to provide factual evidence of YOUR claim. You could have provided rebuttal against Wretch's evidence, but you made a counter claim. So, could you provide factual evidence of your claim that Wretch is wrong?

Where is the evidence lol

Is a thing saying

This is true

??

@GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE
yes, exactly. Where is your evidence?

Evidence for what

That the article is false

Of your claim.

That Wretch is wrong (counter claim, reverse onus) and that the article is false (rebuttal to Wretch's evidence)

There is no evidence in that article

If I published something saying that the moon is made of grape jelly

Would you believe it

Especially if it was published in grapejellymoon.com

@GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE the article is evidence. Your response "If I published something saying that the moon is made of grape jelly Would you believe it Especially if it was published in grapejellymoon.com"
Is a strawman. Can you please address the article itself and stop distracting?

Is not a starwman at all

It's a fair comparison

I would not be able to explain how a moon would.be made of jelly

They can't prove what they are saying either

They just say it

Rebuttal is NOT comparison. You need to address the evidence presented with factual evidence of your own and not a hypothetical.

If they "just say it", then it should be easy to rebut without the need for make-believe comparisons.

You haven't provided ANY factual evidence for anything you've said, or claimed. How do you expect to prove your point without anything more than you yourself saying "because I said so"? You're doing the EXACT thing you're accusing the other side of doing.

I, for one, would like to see a decent debate here that doesn't resort to the breakdown of critical thinking.

"If I published something saying that the moon is made of grape jelly Would you believe it Especially if it was published in grapejellymoon.com"
I believe that this is also a genetic fallacy.

@GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE#3275 you've had plenty of time to respond, yet you haven't. You have run away. I guess it's safe to say that you have been exposed as a troll.

/\ not cool

poor @GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE#3275

https://needtoknow.news/2019/11/measles-triple-vaccine-to-become-mandatory-in-germany/

good for germany

Hello

hi

Yes good little german citizens