Message from @GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE
Discord ID: 644850351035645973
Just saying
I agree
Stop
!mute @plump head
!mute @Tell me lies
@GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE
All you said was, "you're wrong", without any supporting factual evidence. Can you repair that, or will you continue with your same tact?
I'm not the one with burden of proof
He is the one making ridiculous propositions, and showed nothing to support it except an article from an anti vaxx website with some things in all caps
Caps is not truth believe it or not
Well, that's not how it works. @Wretch HAS supplied factual evidence to back their claim. Your rebuttal, to the claim made, has been "you're wrong", which now is a claim and puts a reverse onus on you to provide factual evidence of YOUR claim. You could have provided rebuttal against Wretch's evidence, but you made a counter claim. So, could you provide factual evidence of your claim that Wretch is wrong?
Where is the evidence lol
Is a thing saying
This is true
??
@GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE
yes, exactly. Where is your evidence?
That the article is false
Of your claim.
That Wretch is wrong (counter claim, reverse onus) and that the article is false (rebuttal to Wretch's evidence)
There is no evidence in that article
If I published something saying that the moon is made of grape jelly
Would you believe it
Especially if it was published in grapejellymoon.com
@GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE the article is evidence. Your response "If I published something saying that the moon is made of grape jelly Would you believe it Especially if it was published in grapejellymoon.com"
Is a strawman. Can you please address the article itself and stop distracting?
Is not a starwman at all
It's a fair comparison
I would not be able to explain how a moon would.be made of jelly
They can't prove what they are saying either
They just say it
Rebuttal is NOT comparison. You need to address the evidence presented with factual evidence of your own and not a hypothetical.
If they "just say it", then it should be easy to rebut without the need for make-believe comparisons.
You haven't provided ANY factual evidence for anything you've said, or claimed. How do you expect to prove your point without anything more than you yourself saying "because I said so"? You're doing the EXACT thing you're accusing the other side of doing.
I, for one, would like to see a decent debate here that doesn't resort to the breakdown of critical thinking.
"If I published something saying that the moon is made of grape jelly Would you believe it Especially if it was published in grapejellymoon.com"
I believe that this is also a genetic fallacy.
@GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE#3275 you've had plenty of time to respond, yet you haven't. You have run away. I guess it's safe to say that you have been exposed as a troll.
/\ not cool