Message from @Koalakitty
Discord ID: 638507037990322225
What's your theory on the lack of gravity?
@b_o_om You can't play with the suns mass and see if you actually orbit it or not. Also do you have evidence that we orbit the sun?
Do you have evidence that we don't orbit the sun?
You came with that claim. Burden of proof fallacy
Can you prove your point of view?
I never said it did or did not. Strawman lol
What do you believe then?
That's not important, do you have evidence that we orbit the sun or not? If not then it's a waste of time
You made that claim. Don't get so defensive when someone asks for evidence
Earth orbits the Sun at an average distance of 149.60 million km (92.96 million mi), and one complete orbit takes 365.256 days (1 sidereal year), during which time Earth has traveled 940 million km (584 million mi). Earth's orbit has an eccentricity of 0.0167.
I can find multiple images, theories and other statements which make the claim of us orbiting the Sun.
Arguing against it would require a firm backing which you can assert which as far as I've seen, you don't have.
Someone asks for evidence of how we are orbiting the sun and you give them the distance and the time it takes the orbit? Lol, burden of proof fallacy again. You said that we did orbit the sun.
We do orbit the Sun, what do I need to say to prove such an already proven point?
It's like asking me to prove how I exist as a being, it's a definitive answer to merely look at me or for me to breathe.
We know we orbit around the sun because of the parallax of the stars and the aberration of their light @rivenator12113 (among many other proofs)
Lack of evidence again or are you not going to give me anything substantial? @b_o_om
Are you not going to prove I'm wrong?
The Earth orbits the sun. Prove me wrong.
What should I prove wrong when you haven't given any evidence to your beliefs.
Scientism worshipper
We know we orbit around the sun because of the parallax of the stars and the aberration of their light @rivenator12113 (among many other proofs)
whoops dropped a link
should clean that up
'Scientism worshipper'
I don't know whether to laugh or be concerned.
You're using an argument from ignorance. Disprove to me that god doesn't exist is just as fallaceous as what you said.
Technically if we haven't seen something with our own eyes we can't say something exists or does not exist
@lapizzle Thank you for the substantial evidence.
Koala isn't wrong, but at the same time should the Earth not orbit the Sun so many things would be indescribable.
That is patently false, your eyes are not your only measurement tool @Koalakitty
Is it too hard to be like @lapizzle ?
@lapizzle are you talking about your heart?
🤔
I'm no science freak or to be honest I don't enjoy arguing with people who are adamantly certain in their beliefs and won't back down from it or will make statements which change the course of an argument and make it seem like they've made no claims therefore they don't need to disprove anything.
Maybe that didn't come out right but it's 10pm.
if you have to force religion into something that does not have religion, that's a problem
@b_o_om If you're going to make a claim in the debate channel, kindly supply your own evidence to back it up. That's what River's getting at. Appealing to authority or shifting burden of proof doesn't float in a debate.
@b_o_om '' X does claim, X says other person needs to disprove him. X person is right '' lol