Message from @RadRhys

Discord ID: 641305885083303974


2019-11-05 15:56:40 UTC  

gravity isn't a law lol

2019-11-05 15:56:46 UTC  

**It’s a theory, not a law**

2019-11-05 15:56:54 UTC  

2019-11-05 15:57:03 UTC  

Yeah thats what i meant

2019-11-05 15:57:06 UTC  

A law is a matter of what happens, whereas a theory is a matter of why something happens

2019-11-05 15:57:06 UTC  

My brain died

2019-11-05 15:57:14 UTC  

a theory has a lot of evidence to it

2019-11-05 15:57:32 UTC  

@Drewski4343 90% of the things you say should be pinned

2019-11-05 15:57:35 UTC  

A scientific theory is not a theory until it has been tested.

2019-11-05 15:57:47 UTC  

Yeah drew. All other explanations proposed just aren't as consistent as gravity.

2019-11-05 15:57:57 UTC  

lol thankya

2019-11-05 15:58:23 UTC  

The problem with the standard model is incomplete information and @Drewski4343 Drewski4343 8/ 100% correct

2019-11-05 15:58:36 UTC  

Gravity is the best we have, at the moment, until something better comes around.

2019-11-05 15:58:53 UTC  

which is entirely possible.

2019-11-05 15:59:14 UTC  

Hold on, don’t be misleading there

2019-11-05 15:59:19 UTC  

In the mainstream view sure

2019-11-05 15:59:19 UTC  

Yeah, but so far, no fundamental opposition to it has been proposed.

2019-11-05 15:59:42 UTC  

@PhoenixAshes thats an argument from ignorance phallacy, just because there is no contrary evidence its real?

2019-11-05 16:00:06 UTC  

Florida what other view is as constant as gravity

2019-11-05 16:00:31 UTC  

What do you mean?

2019-11-05 16:00:37 UTC  

Constant? Or consistent

2019-11-05 16:00:40 UTC  

Perhaps, but just as there has been no fundamental opposition to it, there is plenty of evidence that points to gravity operating as proposed.

2019-11-05 16:00:46 UTC  

What other theory would work as well as gravity

2019-11-05 16:00:59 UTC  

@PhoenixAshes that might be true but it's not evidence

2019-11-05 16:01:25 UTC  

I’ve heard a lot of electric universe theories but you would literally be ripped apart atom by atom if that were the case

2019-11-05 16:01:29 UTC  

I already told you a few but they have their own flaws @Aba🥀

2019-11-05 16:01:33 UTC  

In the end we got no idea

2019-11-05 16:01:37 UTC  

If you are able to eliminate potential variables, then yes it is evidence.

2019-11-05 16:01:37 UTC  

Sorry, “theories”*

2019-11-05 16:01:41 UTC  

And that's the honest truth

2019-11-05 16:01:59 UTC  

Gravity has never been proven wrong and theres stacks of evidence supporting the main idea of it

2019-11-05 16:01:59 UTC  

For example, density being the primary factor of falling objects has been refuted.

2019-11-05 16:02:13 UTC  

Gravity is a theory the rest are guesses

2019-11-05 16:02:30 UTC  

Gravity is an assumption based on assumptions

2019-11-05 16:02:49 UTC  

Its an assumption based on observable evidence

2019-11-05 16:03:23 UTC  

@PhoenixAshes can you refute ua or magnetism? magnetism attracts thing and ua mimics the gravitational constant. saying that because there is no opposition to your argument so it must be true is fallaceous as fuck

2019-11-05 16:03:51 UTC  

Gravity is the force that anything with a mass has

2019-11-05 16:03:57 UTC  

@Aba🥀 Gravity is a lot more than that I already told you

2019-11-05 16:04:04 UTC  

Any two things with mass do gravity stuff

2019-11-05 16:05:04 UTC  

Magnetism only affects ferrous materials. What happens when you drop a block of wood?

2019-11-05 16:05:19 UTC  

Gravity is a theory, a theory is a claim that has been supported by evidence and cant be proven wrong, theres a reason its a theory and not a hypothesis or a tumbler post by a crack head