Message from @RadRhys

Discord ID: 641304997388353536


2019-11-05 15:52:59 UTC  

It's an shaky theory but it could explain a lot of things we see on Earth (Electromagnetism)

2019-11-05 15:53:07 UTC  

Not really

2019-11-05 15:53:13 UTC  

I don't know about how it would make the day and night cycle though

2019-11-05 15:53:16 UTC  

That beats me

2019-11-05 15:53:34 UTC  

EM explanations seem to put the ground as being negatively charged, correct?

2019-11-05 15:54:02 UTC  

The earth spins in the round theory effectively blocking off the sun from one side of the world

2019-11-05 15:54:04 UTC  

Which means you would be able to alter the weight of any object by running a current through it.

2019-11-05 15:54:05 UTC  

In most cases it would be yeah

2019-11-05 15:54:36 UTC  

And ferrous materials would be affected more strongly.

2019-11-05 15:55:12 UTC  

Also last i checked im not magnetic

2019-11-05 15:55:29 UTC  

At the end of the day, we don't know what causes things to fall

2019-11-05 15:55:35 UTC  

It's all just educated assumptions for the most part

2019-11-05 15:55:45 UTC  

Other things are just guesses that poorly written

2019-11-05 15:56:18 UTC  

Gravity is literally a theory cause you cant prove it wrong and no one has any other ideas that hold up to the extent gravity does

2019-11-05 15:56:36 UTC  

The deal with gravity: It's an incomplete theory. Quantum gravity can't be renormalized and GR can't explain galactic rotations on macro scales without fudge factors like dark matter/energy. However, it does work extremely, *exceptionally* well on every other level, which is why it's still here.

2019-11-05 15:56:38 UTC  

It’s a theory, not a law

2019-11-05 15:56:40 UTC  

gravity isn't a law lol

2019-11-05 15:56:46 UTC  

**It’s a theory, not a law**

2019-11-05 15:56:54 UTC  

2019-11-05 15:57:03 UTC  

Yeah thats what i meant

2019-11-05 15:57:06 UTC  

A law is a matter of what happens, whereas a theory is a matter of why something happens

2019-11-05 15:57:06 UTC  

My brain died

2019-11-05 15:57:14 UTC  

a theory has a lot of evidence to it

2019-11-05 15:57:32 UTC  

@Drewski4343 90% of the things you say should be pinned

2019-11-05 15:57:35 UTC  

A scientific theory is not a theory until it has been tested.

2019-11-05 15:57:47 UTC  

Yeah drew. All other explanations proposed just aren't as consistent as gravity.

2019-11-05 15:57:57 UTC  

lol thankya

2019-11-05 15:58:23 UTC  

The problem with the standard model is incomplete information and @Drewski4343 Drewski4343 8/ 100% correct

2019-11-05 15:58:36 UTC  

Gravity is the best we have, at the moment, until something better comes around.

2019-11-05 15:58:53 UTC  

which is entirely possible.

2019-11-05 15:59:14 UTC  

Hold on, don’t be misleading there

2019-11-05 15:59:19 UTC  

In the mainstream view sure

2019-11-05 15:59:19 UTC  

Yeah, but so far, no fundamental opposition to it has been proposed.

2019-11-05 15:59:42 UTC  

@PhoenixAshes thats an argument from ignorance phallacy, just because there is no contrary evidence its real?

2019-11-05 16:00:06 UTC  

Florida what other view is as constant as gravity

2019-11-05 16:00:31 UTC  

What do you mean?

2019-11-05 16:00:37 UTC  

Constant? Or consistent

2019-11-05 16:00:40 UTC  

Perhaps, but just as there has been no fundamental opposition to it, there is plenty of evidence that points to gravity operating as proposed.

2019-11-05 16:00:46 UTC  

What other theory would work as well as gravity

2019-11-05 16:00:59 UTC  

@PhoenixAshes that might be true but it's not evidence

2019-11-05 16:01:25 UTC  

I’ve heard a lot of electric universe theories but you would literally be ripped apart atom by atom if that were the case