Message from @catman
Discord ID: 643934268384346152
Now I have to prove that under static stress
If the deformation was enough to cause a sigficant and acknowledgable deformation to the light you would have died flying the airplane
I wouldn't say that was moving the goal posts tbh. there's the issue of the shape of the windows but additionally there's the stresses involved with the changes of internal air pressure to compensate for the changes to the external air pressure. it's not moving goal posts so much as the fact that there's other factors which need to be included
The other factors are negligible
And are therefore ignored
the document cited mentions the stresses as well as the myriad materials selected for the inclusion within the aircraft. but you do need to show proof of this neglibility
If they weren't negligible they would've included them in this beautiful source of you
Yours
as well as the proof to your claim that it doesn't cause distortion
I told you a simple experiment you could peform
That is proof
it has been said by others, possibly yourself, that curvature has been witnessed through aircraft windows, so, we need to establish whether that's as a result of these windows or as a result of actual earth curvature
your simple experiment uses the wrong materials and that wouldn't be very scientific
I was debating laws of optics
sure, but in any case, you haven't substantiated that
nor have you disproved that the curvature witnessed isn't the result of these windows
The light going through the window experiences a linear deformation
so you keep saying
without substantiating
You know what a linear transformation deformation is right?
Just send all flat earthers to space to prove it once and for all
it's where light passes through, it's transformed then deformed and presumably should result in lack of distortion
@positivity globe believers are the ones that believe space is real! send them all up there to prove the globe
Exactly
Therefore
No distortion
Means the earth is curved
well, so you claim! but again, you haven't backed up any of your claims! we've been over this countless times, I made claims, found documents, cited them, linked them and resulted in backing up some of my claims as well as providing other points which need to be considered, none of which you even mentioned or included within any of the explanations you provided, none of which substantiated. so sure, you make the claimm of linear transformation deformation, but you haven't backed that up, nor have you been able to prove that the air pressure change, and change in shape to the window doesn't cause distortion through the window. This is just one of many points that can be debated about flat earth, but I know this isn't a spinning ball we're all on.. This one small piece we're debating is just that: small! I know we're not on a spinning ball, so, with that in mind, any claims to curvature through an aircraft window, is not proof of earth curve, but proof of distortiion
Permissions are not properly configured.
Please check https://biblebot.xyz/permissions for more information.
That's enough out of you, BibleBot.
lol biblebot
The view has a curve
Not cause by the window
that's yet to be proven
Okay
Only fish eye lenses can cause that sort of distion
The window isn't in the shape of a fish eye lense
again though, that is yet to be proven. Anyway, it's been a great debate, I've got to crack on with some other tasks which I've been destracted from. rather than disappearing without saying a word, I'll actually thank you for the discussion and leave it at that for now! 🙂
Good, civil debate. 👌