yes, just like assertions place the burden of proof upon you. you dont have to provide evidence, but if you dont then the assertion can be dismissed without evidence too

Well creationism fails at the very first step

not necessarily

You can't prove it doesn't exist

1 sec

If you can't devise an experiment that proves the statement is false, then it is not debatable

And therefore can not be answered

I'm no mobile

No images please

On*

apparent lack of evidence doesnt mean that said evidence doesnt exist

for example

True

it means we can't debate

gg

to argue that you cant find evidence of god, therefore god doesnt exist would be an example of this fallacy

and assuming that God exists would be a fallacy then?

im not saying you cant debate vit

hmmm

interesting

well, I guess we can't really take this that much deep right now or we will become crazy

im showing him a fallacy

But it's not scientifically provable

oh

it might be

well then it's up to your faith

right now it isn't

but in the future mayby

as far as you know sure

But for no there is no conclusive evidence

none presented here

we agree

Or anywhere that humans have seen

there is no evidence that God exists, neither than he doesn't

Religion is like kinda dumb if you think about it

Just that if he does, there has been no trace

faithless atheist!

same argument for atheism

atheism is dumb actually

why