Message from @Pika

Discord ID: 647190947830169600


2019-11-21 21:44:09 UTC  

no it cant

2019-11-21 21:44:10 UTC  

No it cant

2019-11-21 21:44:23 UTC  

Conservation of mass is a shorthand, matter can be converted into energy and vice versa

2019-11-21 21:44:30 UTC  

Just put into a different form

2019-11-21 21:44:32 UTC  

It can’t

2019-11-21 21:44:32 UTC  

It happens ALL the time

2019-11-21 21:44:33 UTC  

what?

2019-11-21 21:44:39 UTC  

🤦‍♂️

2019-11-21 21:44:46 UTC  

BRUUUUUUH

2019-11-21 21:44:50 UTC  

2019-11-21 21:44:54 UTC  

ok

2019-11-21 21:44:57 UTC  

booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooomer

2019-11-21 21:45:02 UTC  

Nuclear decay is Mass into energy

2019-11-21 21:45:08 UTC  

The random creation and subsequent annihilation of proton-antiproton pairs is observable

2019-11-21 21:45:10 UTC  

!mute @Johnnybird2000 troll

2019-11-21 21:45:10 UTC  

2019-11-21 21:45:21 UTC  

Yeah you guys clearly don't understand what I just said

2019-11-21 21:45:21 UTC  

Yikes

2019-11-21 21:45:32 UTC  

You said matter can’t be created nor destroyed

2019-11-21 21:45:43 UTC  

Transferring isn't the same as being created

2019-11-21 21:45:46 UTC  

Lol I’m not well atm so I cba to deal w trolls

2019-11-21 21:46:11 UTC  

U can change its form but can’t create it or destroy

2019-11-21 21:46:33 UTC  

But it’s not matter. Energy has been observed to be “created” in the sense of entropy temporarily decreasing on micro scales as well

2019-11-21 21:46:42 UTC  

The big question here is how did it get there, and thats what scientists are confused about

2019-11-21 21:46:52 UTC  

Thats what no one knows

2019-11-21 21:47:00 UTC  

Yup

2019-11-21 21:47:18 UTC  

Science is built upon the theories presented

2019-11-21 21:47:19 UTC  

To get an idea we'd need data from a black holes singularity

2019-11-21 21:47:22 UTC  

It's a "despite not knowing" type of thing, which I can understand

2019-11-21 21:47:22 UTC  

Another one of the universe's mysteries

2019-11-21 21:47:32 UTC  

Uncertainty doesn't always mean it isn't correct

2019-11-21 21:47:45 UTC  

It has lead us to the standard model which serves us very well even if it’s demonstrably flawed

2019-11-21 21:48:23 UTC  

But when you present something like the big bang and then use "evidence" to build it up until it's at the point where it's a theory despite actual evidence

2019-11-21 21:48:55 UTC  

We just arent technologically advanced enough

2019-11-21 21:49:34 UTC  

to do what?

2019-11-21 21:49:34 UTC  

Redshifting necessarily means that space was more crunched up at some point in time

2019-11-21 21:50:00 UTC  

We need to merge quantum physics into normal laws and thats why we have string theory as a possible solution

2019-11-21 21:50:06 UTC  

We won't ever be at this rate @positivity

2019-11-21 21:50:46 UTC  

A lot of mainstream science today that is accepted is bs and will be changed in time I'm sure but even then it won't find an answer

2019-11-21 21:50:48 UTC  

You never know, the unexpected happens alot

2019-11-21 21:51:08 UTC  

We're just gonna have to wait and see