no it cant

No it cant

Conservation of mass is a shorthand, matter can be converted into energy and vice versa

Just put into a different form

It can’t

It happens ALL the time

what?

🤦‍♂️

BRUUUUUUH

ok

booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooomer

Nuclear decay is Mass into energy

The random creation and subsequent annihilation of proton-antiproton pairs is observable

!mute @Johnnybird2000 troll

Yeah you guys clearly don't understand what I just said

Yikes

You said matter can’t be created nor destroyed

Transferring isn't the same as being created

Lol I’m not well atm so I cba to deal w trolls

U can change its form but can’t create it or destroy

But it’s not matter. Energy has been observed to be “created” in the sense of entropy temporarily decreasing on micro scales as well

The big question here is how did it get there, and thats what scientists are confused about

Thats what no one knows

Yup

Science is built upon the theories presented

To get an idea we'd need data from a black holes singularity

It's a "despite not knowing" type of thing, which I can understand

Another one of the universe's mysteries

Uncertainty doesn't always mean it isn't correct

It has lead us to the standard model which serves us very well even if it’s demonstrably flawed

But when you present something like the big bang and then use "evidence" to build it up until it's at the point where it's a theory despite actual evidence

We just arent technologically advanced enough

to do what?

Redshifting necessarily means that space was more crunched up at some point in time

We need to merge quantum physics into normal laws and thats why we have string theory as a possible solution

We won't ever be at this rate @positivity

A lot of mainstream science today that is accepted is bs and will be changed in time I'm sure but even then it won't find an answer

You never know, the unexpected happens alot

We're just gonna have to wait and see