#flat-@Soulyearth

There are other ways they try and support the idea of the big bang but it can really be boiled down to the singularity that started it in the first place

stop spamming flat earth

Ohhh a raid why not time for some muted

Did I do it right lol?

Matter can't be created or destroyed

Yes it can

no it cant

No it cant

Conservation of mass is a shorthand, matter can be converted into energy and vice versa

Just put into a different form

It can’t

It happens ALL the time

what?

🤦‍♂️

BRUUUUUUH

ok

booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooomer

Nuclear decay is Mass into energy

The random creation and subsequent annihilation of proton-antiproton pairs is observable

!mute @Johnnybird2000 troll

Yeah you guys clearly don't understand what I just said

Yikes

You said matter can’t be created nor destroyed

Transferring isn't the same as being created

Lol I’m not well atm so I cba to deal w trolls

U can change its form but can’t create it or destroy

But it’s not matter. Energy has been observed to be “created” in the sense of entropy temporarily decreasing on micro scales as well

The big question here is how did it get there, and thats what scientists are confused about

Thats what no one knows

Yup

Science is built upon the theories presented

To get an idea we'd need data from a black holes singularity

It's a "despite not knowing" type of thing, which I can understand

Another one of the universe's mysteries

Uncertainty doesn't always mean it isn't correct

It has lead us to the standard model which serves us very well even if it’s demonstrably flawed

But when you present something like the big bang and then use "evidence" to build it up until it's at the point where it's a theory despite actual evidence

We just arent technologically advanced enough