Message from @🎃Oakheart🎃
Discord ID: 640571828250869760
So do others
Like Harvard
And others
@Citizen Z Evidence.
Yeah go ahead and find it
Im not your monkey
I find it funny u walk around earth thinking you are informed
I think It funny that he believe all this lies of the government
Yes
Like I said, people will justify any NASA or Gov't slip ups.
The screw falling was just one example.
A screw can't fall in 0 gravity.
But people will fabricate ideas to validate that.
Then they walk around thinking they know everything.
24/7 "livestreams" can be CGI fyi.
it cant fall but can have momentum any any random direction
difference is if it accelerates
its its constant speed it implies no gravity forcy on it
The astronaut was pushing upwards, yet the screw DROPPED straight down and banged a few times on the ground.
yes but did the screw accelerate on the fall?
it dropped straight down, it was not gliding.
The demonstrations that they want you to see are just CGI.
yes but did it accelerate?
do you know what accelearation is?
how force works?
What does it matter if it accelerates?
I am aware.
And that is irrelevant.
if it doesnt its just velocity from starting force
if its not accelerating its not example of falling
like on earth i mean
this is very simple
It should float if it was in outer space
It is the recent lithium payload fired by NASA. It's a sounding rocket fired into the upper atmosphere to study the winds on the edge of space. It's something they have done for decades. It's totally unrelated to airplane contrails, and nothing at all like what people call "chemtrails"
Here's NASA's description of the program:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sounding-rockets/
About Sounding Rockets
For over 40 years the Sounding Rocket Program has provided critical scientific, technical, and educational contributions to the nation's space program and is one of the most robust, versatile, and cost-effective flight programs at NASA.
Sounding rockets carry scientific instruments into space along a parabolic trajectory. Their overall time in space is brief, typically 5-20 minutes, and at lower vehicle speeds for a well-placed scientific experiment. The short time and low vehicle speeds are more than adequate (in some cases they are ideal) to carry out a successful scientific experiments. Furthermore, there are some important regions of space that are too low for satellites and thus sounding rockets provide the only platforms that can carry out measurements in these regions.
Content from external source @Citizen Z
It did accelerate, it fell straight down even hitting the wall and the metal ground multiple times.
since all you let go on earth accelerats downwards not just moves
Here's a 1964 description of a similar experiment. As NASA says this is nothing new, and it's nothing secret.
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=sekcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=11gEAAAAIBAJ&dq=nasa sounding rocket lithium&pg=5885,4057829
[​IMG]
The scientist on the other end does use the term "chemtrails" twice that I recall - in the context of "chemical trail" which he also uses for the lithium gas released. He's just using the term because the caller used it, and it's a useful abbreviation for "chemical trails". The rocket obviously leaves a trail of chemicals.
He also points out that the actual trail would be invisible, that lithium is actually hard to use because its invisible and they are trying to develop direct sensors so they don't have to release anything (this test was part of that development programme), and that they are much higher than aircraft contrails. @Citizen Z
and then it lay on the side it hit?
that link doesnt work