Message from @🎃Oakheart🎃
Discord ID: 640891657696444417
C: logic
D: actual research
yet, both sides are too contradictory to provide enough detail that doesnt clash against the other side’s thoughts
Wrong answer
Yes, the logic behind it is fundamentally different
Logic is not an answer.
The problem is, how much can you trust NASA's "research"
Nope
That's just an illusion of perspective.
Besides
You're saying that you can see curvature from just a few miles away, when you can't see any from Mount Everest?
*Globe Logic*
Cause the globes giant compared to us...
Ok so how can you POSSIBLY see ships and buildings sinking from like 3 miles away?
And how is it an illusion and not a pint of view
Point*
And because you have eyes, its called vision
I'm just pointing out a fallacy
The Earth is too big to see the curvature, yet you can see it due to the curve?
It's just heat, or an optical illusion.
Ships can appear to float at sea.
Mhmm thats the light reflecting the image of the boat off the water
I dont think water can reflect light into the sea
Accept the globe
And extreme amounts of evidence
*Evidence*
No
Not evidence
Heres a video explaining the optical illusion better then i can
You can't just say "evidence"
Alright
I'll take a look
Literal greek dudes from over 2 thousand years ago proved the earth was round
Can you explain how btw cause im hoping you can do better then i can 😂
^
Please explain instead of just reading off basic facts and anecdotes you found online, those of which you pass off as research.
Maybe give me evidence instead of telling me to do my own research
No there’s documentation and evidence suggesting they did i just suck at explaining