and yess, i rly don't like *some* concepts of SU

*eg feminism*

Eg gay?

yeah

i mean my uncle's gay because he's infertile

so i don't have a problem with gays

thank you fat blue robot bimb ball

hope you die

That's something a smartass would say.

nahhh

i get your sarcasm

I mean, I understand gay people exist and all but I don't think they should be influencing children by having it on TV and children shows.

too beta to make a difference

if you think that DARPA is releasing their latest tech projects to the public concerning AI robotics and alike for all to watch on YT, then we can agree to disagree on that point. @Atlas the Friendly Robot

i call 'gay people' as just some peeps that keep it to themselves and are friendly

or understand common sense

now 'fåggots' are just these cúnts that think they're superior for being gay

or even force others to be, and call those who are not gay dumb

or immoral, pig, poisonous

etc

@carlito i dont think they are. I just dont agree with you that the gap is as big as you say it is. i'd say 5-7 years ahead, 10 max

people tend to become a liiiittle more conscious over 11

little

lol

you do realise that we are both purely speculating, right? @Atlas the Friendly Robot besides, 10years while using Moore's law is streaks ahead than either one of us are willing to admit

moores law is on its tail end

@mærsh In this day and age people are being taught (not 'directly' of course) that being gay is special and if you aren't you're a bad person who shouldn't exist. That last part is mostly a joke but you know what I mean.

im assuming they are working on things like quantum computers by now

!mute @Diversey

yes ^,, look neither of us 'know' just how far they are ahead.. imo they're further than in your opinion.. oneday it might be revealed who was more accurate but for now we'll both stick with our opinions

!mute @12kasperg

@carlito agreed

!mute @not sure

<:silly:507986623850348547>

where were this people

?

***where were***