Message from @negatic
Discord ID: 647128665494257674
i mean coriolis is for examplea fictitius force its not existent in the sense of being a force but it takes a while to explain why this is and what exactly else it is
uhm flat u ever heard of the saying the better you udnerstand something the easyer it is to explain that thing to others?
i never heard about if it takes u amny words its wrong
i mean evidence and proofs in maths for example take long often enough
a math proof is far longer than the equation its supposed to proof
what hes saying reminds me of a fallacy
and its 100% certain after that its true
look at math proofs to see that ur wrong flatwater
Math proofs oh you mean the thing that isn't experiments in the natural world? Yea that got us the globe earth deception
hasty generalization. but also, it seems that he prefers over simplification
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.- OG EINSTEIN
what your saying shows you got not much knowledge about math
Explaining something simply doesnt mean it cant be a long explanation
yes lain but simply dont mean with less words
it just means ina way others can understand it
and by substituting words someone dont understand u need more words to replace them
its the nature of explaining
to explain 1 small special word u may need sentences
cults can use fewer words and more mental gymnastics to explain something
i mean even dictionarys define and explain words and they may need lots of words liek 1-2 sentences to do this
i mean coriolis is 1 word witha specific meaning but how do you relay it with other words so that someone can understand it ?
inerta
reference frame
If youve ever tried to teach 12 y olds you'd know it takes a lot of time for even the most basic maths
do you understand the emaning behind those words easy? no
yes
and the lower the knowledge of ther person the more simple and longer the explanation gets
Confucius say: "The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name" Not use many words to explain my inability to use the right words in the first place
sure but this doesnt proof your point
it basically calls everyone who dno a word stupid
Yea
Not how it works
u do udnerstand that hes basically calling people who dno the specific word for something stupid cause they can only describe it right?
its like you lack the word car and say a vehicle with 4 whells its driving around town all the time etc
Yea
oh well if you still disagree then so be it
thats a first for you negatic
Gg
hm
Insta promotion to temp control